Washington, I-5 bridge collapses, Who IS Responsible?

Comment By Bob L.
05-24-2013

Bridge collapse, Who Is Really At Fault? I look at the state, they have been lax on spending road use taxes inappropriately, by inappropriately, I mean they have spent more money, in and around Seattle and King County then they have anywhere else in Washington State.

This State spends more money in King County and Seattle on Stadiums and other projects like, a tunnel under the city which is not needed, constant road work in and around Seattle, Bellevue, and Renton to supply more access to Sports Arena’s in Seattle and what ever else they want. 

They will say that they do road work in other places in the state, right they do, but not as much as they do in Seattle.

Where did the money go that the federal Government gave them to replace the Alaskan way viaduct over Ten years ago, from what I heard on the news when I was living in Ohio, the State spent it on the two sports stadiums, not on Infrastructure as they were suppose to.

===========================================================  

I-5 bridge collapse survivor: ‘You hold on’

Associated Press  By MANUEL VALDES and MIKE BAKER | Associated Press
05-24-2013

MOUNT VERNON, Wash. (AP) — Dan Sligh and his wife were in their pickup truck on Interstate 5 heading to a camping trip when a bridge before them disappeared in a “big puff of dust.”

“I hit the brakes and we went off,” Sligh told reporters from a hospital, adding he “saw the water approaching … you hold on as tight as you can.”

Sligh, his wife and another man in a different vehicle were dumped into the chilly waters of the Skagit River when the span collapsed Thursday evening. They were injured, but miraculously, authorities said it appeared nobody was killed in the bridge failure that raised the question about the safety of aging spans and cut off the main route between Seattle and Canada.

“We don’t think anyone else went into the water,” said Marcus Deyerin, a spokesman for the Northwest Washington Incident Management Team. “At this point we’re optimistic.”

Sligh and his wife were taken to Skagit Valley Hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. The other man was reported in stable condition at United General Hospital in Sedro-Woolley, hospital CEO Greg Reed said.

Authorities are trying to determine what caused the bridge to collapse about 60 miles north of Seattle in Skagit County.

State Patrol detectives and the patrol’s commercial vehicle enforcement bureau troopers spoke to a commercial truck driver whose rig struck the structure.

“We do have the truck driver who remained at the scene. We’ve had initial conversations with him to get an indication as to what occurred,” said State Patrol Chief John Batiste.

Sligh said his shoulder was dislocated in the drop into the water, and he found himself “belly deep in water in the truck.” He said he popped his shoulder back in and called out to his wife, who he described as being in shock initially as they waited for rescuers to arrive in boats.

Traffic along the heavily travelled route could be affected for some time.

“The I-5 corridor is totally disrupted,” said Gov. Jay Inslee, who went to the scene Thursday night.

He said work has already started to design detours, but state Transportation Secretary Lynn Peterson asked people to avoid I-5 in the area for the next several days.

The National Transportation Safety Board was sending an investigative team.

Trooper Francis said a portion of the four-lane bridge over the Skagit River collapsed about 7 p.m.

Jeremiah Thomas, a volunteer firefighter, said he was driving nearby when he glimpsed something out of the corner of his eye and turned to look.

“The bridge just went down, it crashed through the water,” he said. “It was really surreal.”

The bridge was about 50 feet above the water. Deyerin said it appeared that two vehicles – a car and the pickup with the travel trailer attached – fell into the river. He said the water depth was about 15 feet, and the vehicles half-visible in the water likely were resting on portions of the collapsed bridge.

Crowds of people lined the river to watch the scene unfold.

“It’s not something you see every day,” said Jimmy O’Connor, the owner of two local pizza restaurants who was driving on another bridge parallel to the one that collapsed. “People were starting to crawl out of their cars.”

He said he and his girlfriend were about 400 yards away on the Burlington Bridge when they heard “just a loud bang.”

“Then we looked over and saw the bridge was down in the water,” he said.

He pulled over and saw three vehicles in the water, including the camping trailer that landed upside-down, he said.

The bridge was not classified as structurally deficient, but a Federal Highway Administration database listed it as being “functionally obsolete” — a category meaning that the design is outdated, such as having narrow shoulders and low clearance underneath.

The bridge was built in 1955 and has a sufficiency rating of 57.4 out of 100, according to federal records. That is well below the statewide average rating of 80, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal data, but 759 bridges in the state have a lower sufficiency score.

According to a 2012 Skagit County Public Works Department report, 42 of the county’s 108 bridges are 50 years or older. The document says eight of the bridges are more than 70 years old and two are over 80.

Washington state was given a C in the American Society of Civil Engineers’ 2013 infrastructure report card and a C- when it came to the state’s bridges. The group said more than a quarter of Washington’s 7,840 bridges are considered structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.

Democratic Rep. Judy Clibborn, who leads the transportation committee in the state House, said the bridge wasn’t one that has been a focus for lawmakers.

“It is shocking that I-5 would have something happen like this,” she said.

Clibborn said the collapse will call attention to the issues facing bridges — especially the old bridge over the Columbia River that connects Vancouver and Portland, Ore.

Sligh said his wife was “doing OK” and that he had “lots of cuts.”

“You’re kind of pinching yourself and realize you’re lucky to be alive.”

___

Baker reported from Olympia, Wash. Associated Press writers Chris Grygiel in Seattle and Terry Tang in Phoenix also contributed to this report.

Categories: Money, Politics, Taxes, Greed, People, Democrats, Republicans, America, Governor, Local Governments, Corruption | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

I have not done anything wrong

Comment By bob L.
05-22-2013

I have not done anything wrong, words of the Obama administration, and the famous last words of Richard M Nixon, I am not guilty, I did not know any thing about it, this all sounds like we have heard this all before.

The only one thing wrong with this, they say History repeats it’s self every one hundred years, they goofed, it has not been one hundred years, Nixon did not get impeached, but he did resign August 9, 1974 before he could get impeached, here we  are again, going through the same thing again starting in the year 2013, actually it started in 2009.

Any one who stands on the Fifth Amendment who breaks the Constitution and Bill of Rights to protect themselves, they should be classified as an enemy of the Country, and it should be classified as a Felony and spent Sixty years in Prison and can no longer be involved in Government for corruption and a crime against the Country and it’s People.

============================================================================================

IRS official Lois Lerner: ‘I have not done anything wrong’

By Chris Moody, Yahoo! News | The Ticket
05-22-2013

Lois Lerner, the Internal Revenue Service official in charge of approving applications for tax-exempt status, denied wrongdoing in response to accusations that the IRS targeted conservative organizations seeking nonprofit status for heavier scrutiny between 2010 and 2012.

“I have not done anything wrong,” Lerner told the House Oversight Committee during a hearing about the IRS’ practices Wednesday. “I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

Lerner’s opening statement before the committee was the only information she would provide at the hearing. As advised by her attorney, Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself by testifying and declined to respond to questions from lawmakers. She added that by refusing to subject herself to questions “some people will assume I have done something wrong. I have not.”

After Lerner delivered the opening statement, committee Chairman Darell Issa, a Republican of California, asked her to leave the committee room.

Before she could exit, however, South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy, a Republican on the committee, protested Issa’s dismissal of the witness.

“She just testified; she just waived her Fifth Amendment right to privilege. You don’t get to tell your side of the story and then not be subjected to cross-examination,” Gowdy said. “That’s not the way it works. … She ought to stand here and answer our questions.”

Issa implored her to reconsider her decision and asked if she would be willing to discuss testimony she had provided to the committee at earlier hearings.

“I will not answer any questions or testify today,” Lerner responded.

“I decline to answer that question for the reasons I’ve already given,” Lerner added, and Issa dismissed her from the room.

Despite her unwillingness to speak before the bipartisan House panel, Lerner previously answered questions from the Treasury inspector general, and a transcription of her responses, in which she denied that the IRS practices were influenced by outside agencies, was provided to the committee.

With Lerner’s absence, the committee moved on to question four other witnesses: the IRS’ outgoing Acting Commissioner Steven Miller; former Commissioner Douglas Shulman; Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George; and Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal S. Wolin.

Categories: America, Corruption, Democrats, Greed, Money, Obama, Politics, Republicans, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Are You The Problem??, Or The Solution To Fix The Problems??

Comment By Bob L.
05-17-2013

Over the Years I have seen how people and things have changed, and you know what, people have gotten very Lazy and Greedy, they have changed the laws to protect Criminals and their rights, they have put legal American Citizens in harms way of criminals to kill, injury, and scam (no enforcement), and what has happen from this, if YOU can not see it by now, THAN YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

I am turning Seventy and have seen what has happened with the mentality of the youth of today, they have gotten Lazy and Greedy, they want money and not work for it, they want every thing and they want it now, they are always in a hurry to get no where, they don’t have time to sit down and look at what they are doing, or for their kids in the future (but always talk about it but do nothing), and what the outcome is going to be, because they can not wait.

 Look at what has happen here recently, they want a health care that they don’t even know what is in it, or what it is going to cost, now or in the future, just because it has been painted as a pretty picture, they think is good, but this is one of the problems, they don’t listen, they let some one else do their thinking for them, because they are in to big of a hurry, they could care less on what could happen.

Back in the early sixties and before people knew their neighbors, some got together and had group picnics, we would all go to a Federal, State, or City park, or we would just get together and have a big breakfast party on Saturdays if the weather was bad, what do you see to-day, GREED, and Laziness, and not wanting to get together unless there was a profit made from it.

Years back and when this country got started, people worked together, sure they made mistakes, but who doesn’t, but look at what happen when they made those mistakes, today we are paying the price, by laws that were passed to protect the greedy by allowing Slavery, Prostitution, and Drugs (which they now want to pass so they can profit on), and what has happen, we are now paying the price for it, because they did not think about what will happen in the future.

Look back at Prohibition over Alcohol, they were enforcing that law, then stopped because of the rich and a profit (better known as I will scratch your back if you scratch mine) and now they are going to do the same thing with Marijuana, and what other Drugs for their profit, (maybe drug wars here for control of it) but not for the safety of the American people.

Alcohol has Killed Thousands of people and kids today and over the years and what have they done about it, now you have to worry about more drugs and gang violence on the streets, and people behind the wheel on drugs, and now the Government Agencies are wanting to profit from it, and how many more people are going to be killed by it in drug wars (and it will happen), here again no one is looking in to the future at the possible out come from their actions.

People today had better sit down and start taking care of this Country, or there will be nothing left to take care of but bending over to kiss some Dictators ASS to stay alive.

This is not what our Ancestors fought for, just to see Lazy Greedy YUPPIES destroy what they worked for to leave for their children in the future, but today College Education is bringing down this Country, it has done nothing but produce a Lazy Greedy society, people back then had more education then they do today, they knew how to use their brains, and they did not sit on them.

Take a look at this article, House votes to repeal Obamacare — for 37th time, we would not be doing this again if people would have taken the time to read and under stand it before they let it get passed, but NO they believed that the Democrats are for the American people, they are not, NO Politician is for the people, they are in it for their own pocket-book today, and the Rich, NOT YOURS.

Where I live, we are working to get packages to our Troops who have been there for a while, but the funny thing that we have run in to, is that even the Military is not interested in helping without making some thing out of it, we have been working on this for over a month, and every one we talk to never get back to us, is this what our dignitaries in this Country think of our troops, and is this why they get spit on when they come back home. I HOPE NOT, these guys leave their families to protect you freedom, and this is what you show them and how you treat them.

These people are not Military scum as the way you think of them, they are Americans, they are your Neighbors, they are not the Enemy they are Protectors who have Volunteered to protect your Freedoms that you enjoy, would you have these freedoms if they waited until the war came over here, look at what we have now, a Government that thinks that it can not happen over here, YOU BETTER THINK AND LOOK  AGAIN at what has just happened on 911, Boston, and the ones that they have stopped.

Categories: America, Corruption, Democrats, Greed, Health, Local Governments, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, Rich, Taxes, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Who’s Side are Americans On, America or Terrorist Bullying

Comment By Bob L.
05-14-2013

Who’s side are Americans on, are they now joining Terrorist or are they Americans who support local business and jobs, or are they for more contaminated foods brought in from other Countries.

Americans it seem, think with their heads stuck up their Ass and have nothing else better to do, but side with radical terrorist that want to bring this Country down, just look how many jobs have been lost because of them, when is America going to wake up and stop believing this Administration that is supporting these radical terrorist groups here and abroad. 

Look what is coming out of Colleges today, Brain Washed Idiots, is this what our Taxes are funding, education to promote Terrorism in this Country.

Look what is happening now, IRS is harassing certain non-profit organizations, this Administration is pressuring businesses  (or is it black mailing) to support things that people don’t want, when is it going to stop, after this country goes under, is THIS the type of Country you all want.

Americans it seems that they don’t even want to support our military personal who are doing what they are ordered to do, THAT IS THEIR JOB, so you can have the freedom that you Enjoy Today, they don’t want to do it, but who else will defend this country if they don’t, it is sure not the lazy Americans who won’t even work, they would rather sit back and let some one else pay for their life style, and then complain that they want more.

Look how many Dry Land Farms and jobs have been lost because of Environmental Terrorists Groups.

=====================================================================

Fight to close California oyster farm divides community and gains national attention

By Holly Bailey, Yahoo! News | The Ticket
05-14-2013

INVERNESS, Calif.—It is coming up on planting season at Drakes Bay Oyster Company, a tiny family-owned oyster farm located on a inlet nestled within the lush grassy cliffs that run along the Pacific Ocean here just north of San Francisco.

For more than 50 years, the modest farm, which looks like nothing more than a cluster of shacks, has been one of California’s leading producers of shellfish. Grown in the clear blue waters of what is known as Drakes Estero, Drakes Bay oysters make up a third of California’s annual shellfish production and are on the menu at some of the Bay Area’s top restaurants.

But the Lunny family, which purchased the farm in 2004, has been reluctant to begin planning cultivation for future seasons because they aren’t sure they will be here for much longer. For months, the Lunnys have been locked in an intense legal fight to keep the Interior Department from closing their farm—a closely watched case that heads before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Tuesday.

At issue is a decision made last November by then-Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who declined to extend Drakes Bay’s 40-year-lease, which allowed it to operate on public land within the Point Reyes National Seashore that was created decades after the oyster farm’s inception.

The Lunnys, who had been pressing for an extension of their lease for years, sued—arguing Salazar based his decision on flawed environmental impact studies produced by the National Park Service, which oversees the land. They also contend he ignored a 2009 bill championed by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein and approved by Congress that would allow the farm’s lease to be extended by another 10 years.

Kevin Lunny, who owns the farm with his brothers, casts the fight as a battle between his family and an overzealous federal agency that is bowing to pressure from a powerful lobby of environmentalists who refuse to see benefits of farming on federal land. He says the government is ignoring the concerns from local residents who see his farm an important local sustainable food source.

“We are a part of a working landscape, the agriculture which is a key part of the fabric, the history and the culture that was always expected to be preserved here on the seashore,” Lunny said in an interview with Yahoo News. “What we are doing is fighting for our business, our employees and our community against a federal bureaucracy that seems to want to ignore the will of the people.”

But his opponents argue it’s more important to restore the land to protected wilderness and that extending the Drakes Bay oyster lease would set a dangerous national precedent that would allow commercial operations on other federal park lands.

“It’s a contract issue, a deal’s a deal,” said Amy Trainer, head of the Environmental Action Committee of West Marin, one of the farm’s most outspoken opponents. “If (Lunny) is allowed to stay, then we think that hurts the integrity of all our national parks and wilderness areas.”

Both Lunny and his opponents insist they are each trying to be the best stewards of the land along the Pacific seacoast—and both claim to have science on their side to prove they are doing just that. At the same time, both claim to be speaking for the majority of residents in the region.

The case has become something of a local soap opera in Marin County, where the farm is located—dividing local residents and elected officials, many of whom refused to be interviewed because of fear of retribution. The local newspapers in recent weeks have been full of warring op-eds from interested parties on both sides of the debate, which has split people who have traditionally been allies like Feinstein and the environmental lobby. There have been rallies and petitions circulated by both sides–and even snarky bumper stickers issued, including one that read, “Shuck you, Secretary Salazar.”

More recently, the fight has gone national. In December, Lunny’s cause was picked up by Cause of Action, a Washington-based conservative watchdog group, that has been handling his case pro bono.

The farm’s opponents quickly seized on that development, pointing out that the group’s executive director, Dan Epstein, once worked for a foundation financed by Charles Koch, who, along with his brother David, has spent tens of millions of dollars to boost conservative candidates and causes. But Cause of Action has said it has not taken any money directly or indirectly from the Koch Brothers.

Lee Rubinstein, a spokesman for the group, said they were drawn to the case because of flawed science in a Park Service impact study on Drakes Bay—including a claim that the farm’s operations were hurting harbor seals. The Park Service later retracted the claim after criticism from outside scientists who said their study was inaccurate.

“When you get an agency that is playing really very fast and loose with the science, that is engaging in a whole variety of very questionable practices, where it is going to astounding lengths… to prove there is some sort of disturbance with seals, from a policy standpoint, this is tremendously worrisome because we depend on agencies to do things in a transparent manner (and) a professional manner,” Rubinstein told Yahoo News.

The case also has gotten attention from Republican members of Congress, including Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, who included a provision to extend Drakes Bay’s lease another decade in a GOP energy bill that primarily aimed to speed up production of the Keystone XL pipeline—an anathema to environmental groups. That attracted the attention of other national environmental lobby, including the Sierra Club and the National Resources Defense Council, that has mentioned the oyster farm fight in fundraising emails to their members and pumped funds into the region to lobby the debate.

In a situation that created even more strange bedfellows in the case, a group of well-known chefs recently submitted a legal brief in support of keeping Drakes Bay Oysters open. Among the signers was Alice Waters, the famed chef at Berkeley’s Chez Panisse who is one of the nation’s best known proponents for using locally sourced food.

For his part, Lunny insists he’s stunned to be in the middle of a debate that he said increasingly seems to be “less and less about a little oyster farm and more about issues that have nothing to do with us.”

“All we are trying to do is stay open, to keep our way of life,” said Lunny, who has lived on the coast near the Point Reyes seashore his entire life.

His family first came to the coast in the 1940s, when his grandparents opened a cattle ranch in the hills near the oyster farm. His family still owns the ranch, but Lunny says if the oyster farm closes, the cattle operation could be at risk, as well, because they would still be obligated to pay back bank loans they took out on the oyster farm.

“We are facing bankruptcy,” Lunny said.

But he quickly added that it’s more than just about his family, pointing to his farm’s 30 employees and their families—about half of whom live on site. He said the workers would not only be out of jobs, but would be homeless and with a skill set that would likely force them to start all over with new careers or to move to other areas where oyster operations are flourishing, like Washington State.

Yet the irony in Lunny’s legal battle is that even if he succeeds in court, the farm may still be forced out of business. At issue Tuesday is whether Drakes Bay can stay open while the Lunny family’s case against the Interior Department and the Park Service is being litigated. If the panel says no, the farm could be evicted within weeks—and Lunny would be forced to remove and destroy in upwards of 20 million oysters growing in the water. That would effectively kill his business, Lunny said.

But even if Lunny can get a reprieve and wins his case in court forcing the Interior Department to reconsider its decision not to extend his lease, it doesn’t mean he will win that battle either.

“We could go through this whole process and still not get another lease,” Lunny said. “It all very nerve-wracking and depressing to not know what your future is going to be. You try to hope for the best, but you can’t help but feel anxious.”

But Lunny’s opponents have shown him no sympathy. In an interview, Trainer accused Lunny of polluting the waters in Drake’s Estero, flouting local environmental regulations and treating his employees badly by not giving them adequate health insurance and overtime pay (allegations he denies). And she slammed Lunny and his supporters for putting out what she described as “misinformation” in an effort to boost their cause.

“The story has been, ‘This poor farmer, and he’s a victim of the government,’ and it’s just complete nonsense,” Trainer said. “He’s getting all kinds of free legal advice, hundreds of thousands of dollars in free legal help. He’s working with all these ultra-conservative members of Congress.”

But Lunny counters that while he has accepted help from those willing to help, it doesn’t mean he agrees with all of their views. He, in turn, accuses Trainer and local environmentalists of being unwilling to even try to find common ground and for personal attacks that aren’t true.

“I have never been treated like the enemy before, and it’s been an uncomfortable position,” Lunny said, adding that he’s invited his opponents to come view his operation, but none have.

Sighing, he added, “I am a farmer. That’s all I want to do.”

Categories: America, Democrats, Freedom, Greed, Health, Independence, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Republicans, Taxes, Unemployed, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Non Government Workers GO TO H—

Comment By bob L.
05-07-2013

Now why would any one need a “market-driven rate adjustments” for their wages, would that just happen to be because they are the ones who are causing the market to go out of control by all these outrageous Pay and Health packages along with Cost of living, and then the cost increases of their services to the public.

It would sure be nice if all American Workers (people who work and work to a full retirement) could get this when ever they wanted, but it seems that the people who work for the Government  and people who won’t or don’t work get all these fancy perks.

It is just like the teachers, Public servants say they need books and study aids for teaching, or say it is for maintenance, and Bang and with a BIG bang, they go on strike for more benefits and pay, in the mean time what they were asking for went for what they were striking for, not for what it was intended for.

And just think, the City says they don’t have the money to pay for the safety of the people, like road work, Police, and Fire, so how can they come up with this amount of money, that’s right, higher taxes, and more people moving to the streets as their homes, but they won’t admit that there are  more homeless people looking for a place to call home besides the street or a car.

 

===================================================================

Tacoma council to vote on $7.2 million in pay hikes 9 hrs ago

More than 400 nonunion city workers – mostly Tacoma Public Utilities employees – are set to receive what officials are calling “market-driven rate adjustments” and other pay increases totaling $7.2 million

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Local Governments, Money, People, Politics, Republicans, Rich, Taxes | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Do You Really Know What the Constitution Means to You, is it a Dictator Government?

Comment By Bob L.
05-07-2013

It makes me wonder how a person can ride around on a Patriotic Bicycle Questioning what the Constitution really means.  How about you, what do you think it means, think and real hard, but what I think he is getting at is, that people don’t really know or under stand what it really means to you and this Country.

To me it means that Not one man or Government has the right to have full control of every thing and its laws, in other words a Draconian Government, If you are not sure of Draconian, it represents what this Government is trying to do today (of or relating to Draco, 7th-century Athenian statesman and lawmaker, or his code of laws, which prescribed death for almost every offence) Do what I say or you are, maybe not died but disappear.

Today this Government is trying to take away the rights and protection that our Ancestors came to this Country to get away from, and today this Country has become what they came here to get away from, taxation without representation, a Dictating Government, and the Oppression from the Rich.

We have seen this in Countries that Oppress and control its people by what you do or say, who you are going to BOW to, pay taxes to and how much, if you don’t think that this is happening today, you had better open your eyes and stop letting these minority groups lead you down the wrong path of Oppression (the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner) Hitler, is a good example.

The U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights must not be Dismantled.

 

==================================================================

Man tours U.S. on Harley asking Americans what the Constitution means to them

By Dylan Stableford, Yahoo! News
05-07-2013

Last year, radio host Peter Sagal was in Lexington, Ky., filming an upcoming PBS documentary on the U.S. Constitution when a man approached his film crew with a lead pipe.

“He looked like the Jesse Pinkman character in ‘Breaking Bad,’” Sagal—host of NPR’s “Wait Wait … Don’t Tell Me!”—told Yahoo News recently.

Sagal was in Lexington to interview Tanya Fogle, a former University of Kentucky basketball star and ex-con whose crack cocaine addiction led to a 10-year prison sentence—and to her becoming a fervent activist for restoring voting rights to felons.

When the pipe-wielding man began to protest their right to film there, Fogle, Sagal said, “got in his face,” and he backed off.

It was one of a few dicey moments during the year-long shoot for the four-part documentary series, “Constitution USA,” which premieres Tuesday at 9 p.m. on PBS.

The show explores what the Constitution means in the 21st century, with Sagal criss-crossing the country on a red, white and blue Harley Davidson motorcycle in search of ordinary Americans who “are struggling with issues of affirmative action, same-sex marriage, voting rights, the role of government and equal protection.”

What Sagal discovered, he said, is that the Constitution is “not what most people believe it to be, a guarantee of our freedoms. It’s our right to them.”

Freedom, Sagal points out, is not included among the Constitution’s 4,418 words.

“Many of us—and I include myself here—don’t really understand the document,” he continued. “But that has never stopped us from arguing about what it means.”

The host pointed to an interview he did with Al Snyder, the Marine father whose son’s funeral was picketed by the Westboro Baptist Church. Members of the church believe U.S. military deaths are God’s punishment for the country’s tolerance of homosexuality.

“My son died for the Constitution,” Snyder told Sagal. “But I can’t believe our forefathers meant for something like this to be free speech.”

Snyder sued the church, and the case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Westboro’s right to protest.

“There’s a right to free speech, even for these hateful morons,” Sagal said.

The documentary, timed to coincide with 225th anniversary of the Constitution’s ratification, was shot almost entirely before the gun debate sparked by the Newtown, Conn., school shootings began. As a result, the Second Amendment does not figure prominently in the show.

“Going into this, we felt abortion and the Second Amendment had been talked to death by the usual talking heads, and that nothing more could be said,” Sagal said. “And until Newtown, we were right.”

But despite what gun control advocates and Second Amendment rights activists believe, Sagal said, the right to bear arms “is not a constitutional issue—it’s a legislative issue.”

There are wide variety of gun laws already on the books, Sagal noted, and a legislative process that exists to change them.

“So far,” he said, “this is what we want.”

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Greed, Obama, People, Politics, Religion, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Transit Monopoly’s

Comment By Bob L.
05-04-2013

Pierce transit has done what all transit Companies have done, they have gotten to big for their britches, they spend more money than they have coming in, wages from the top to the bottom just like all public servants are breaking America.

As long as Pierce Transit has been in service you think they would know how many people ride the bus every day, look at the size of buses they run, forty-foot and that only has four people on them, you would think that they would run a smaller and cheaper bus on non peak hours.

Starting their own Transit System they will eventually have the same problem as Pierce Transit, the Cities won’t have any control over the operation, for one people at the top will want a BIG PAY PACKAGE, then you will have the UNION DICTATE on how it will be run and how much will be paid, not saying all Unions are bad, but Unions today are now a business in their own, and they only care about them selves.

If they work with-in their income they will survive but if they get greedy as other Transit Systems, they will crash with the support of the people. Sure people want service and will complain when service is not there, but if run right it will survive.

==================================================================

Unhappy cities consider severing ties with Pierce Transit

By ZAHID ARAB / KING 5 News
Posted on May 3, 2013

With long waits and low reliability, some cities may go a different route and break away from Pierce Transit if service isn’t improved.

Out of a total of 37 routes operated by Pierce Transit, seven service the eastern part of the county.

Fife, Milton, Edgewood and Puyallup are all considering breaking away from the agency and becoming a new one called “East Pierce Transit.”

Fife City Councilman Glenn Hull, who is also on the Pierce Transit Board of Commissioners, is spearheading the idea, which would function on private public partnerships.

“There could be a separation in the future if our needs aren’t being met,” said Hull.

According to Hull, the issue is crucial in eastern parts of the south sound.

“We do a lot of waiting and transferring,” said Nicole Carner, a bus rider.

“It’s a hassle because of the infrequency between stops, said another bus rider, Aubrey Perry.

Late start times and distance between bus stops are common complaints.

“Depending on where your house is, it’s a quarter mile to a mile and a half to the nearest bus stop. These are difficult decision to have because people’s lives depend on this,” said Hull.

Nearly 70 percent of Pierce Transit’s revenue comes from sales tax. If Fife separates from it, officials say losing the money generated by the city’s many car dealerships would be devastating.

“It would hurt the entire system,” said Marilyn Strickland, Tacoma Mayor and Pierce Transit Board Chair.

Strickland is committed to working out a compromise to keep the cities with the agency.

“We’re really trying to think of the agency differently, but also be aware of the fact that we have limited resources,” said Strickland.

Nearly $136 million has been cut this year. An additional $6.6 million will be cut May 13th.  With the last two ballot measures voted down, money is tight.

“Improving the system is a great idea, but breaking off, I don’t think that would work,” said Carner.

The Pierce Transit Board will present ways to improve east side service in June.

If the cities still want to sever ties, they’ll do a 18 month outreach study to see if people will support a new system.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Jobs, Money, People, Republicans, Taxes | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Sheep Being led To The Slaughter

Comment By Bob L.
05-02-2013

I can now under stand why this Country is going to pot, Education is running at a failing Grade of F, and falling farther behind the rest of the world.

The problem with this Country today is that most Americans are followers and can not do any thing with out some one telling them what to do, a good example is this Administration, it is leading this Country to the slaughter of the U.S. Constitution and it’s Freedom, and the people as usual are Following them.

Look Around, you have a Government that is now thinking about making Marijuana legal so they can make more money for them selves, and not caring about the health and safety of this Country.

These followers just got through getting passed a SMOKING BAN in two States, and now you have Democrats who want to throw it all away, and now they are wanting to pass laws that will go back to smoking and disregarding the health of others.

This Country does very little to discourage Drunk Driving, look around, how many times have you seen the Courts keep turning them louse to eventually end up killing some one, and now they want some one drinking and driving, they want to put Drugs behind the wheel.

How about this, If a truck driver uses a mouth wash after brushing his teeth can be fined if stopped the first half hour, will get charged a DUI, but the breathalyzer only shows a .o3, but if you are driving a car you can drive up to .o7 and get away with it, a mouth wash is not noticeable after about one Hour.

People Don’t care about the Health effects of smoking MARIJUANA or being around it, but they do have a problem being around Cigarette smoke, here again being led like sheep my a minority group.

OBAMACARE?????

MARIJUANA HEALTH HAZARDS

Dangers of Marijuana:Ingredients

Marijuana is a toxic plant that is unsafe for human use. It is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States. Marijuana can be smoked, brewed, or mixed into baked goods. It is a mild hallucinogen that can cause serious health effects.

When marijuana is smoked, it is smoked unfiltered and therefore the smoke is consumed almost entirely. Smoking marijuana can cause different diseases such as laryngitis and bronchitis. There are also many side effects from using marijuana. If you are intoxicated, marijuana can impair your driving performance, communication, memory, and it can interfere with your decision-making abilities. There are 50-70% more cancer causing chemicals in marijuana than in cigarettes. The risk of heart attack becomes 4 times more likely with marijuana. Some feelings that you may get from smoking it are tiredness, depression, paranoia, anxiety, or you can become severely disoriented.

Many people, especially teens, think that smoking marijuana makes them feel relaxed when in fact, it tricks the brain into feeling relaxed when it actually speeds up your heart rate. Many people dislike marijuana because of the weight gain caused by the “munchies” that come as a result of smoking it. Smoking marijuana merely postpones coping with problems. And since it is stored in your body, the effects can persist for several days or even weeks. And no matter what you have heard, there is no current accepted medical use for marijuana in the U.S.

The most active chemical in marijuana is THC. And marijuana can sometimes be “laced” with other chemical substances that can increase its harm.

Sources

Info Facts: Marijuana

http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofax/marijuana.html

Research Report Series: Marijuana Abuse

http://www.nida.nih.gov/ResearchReports/Marijuana/Marijuana4.html

Categories: America, Democrats, Freedom, Greed, Health, Money, People, Republicans, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

All we need is a Stepping Stone to Increase Drug Use, Legal and Illegal

Comment By Bob L.
04-30-2013

Here we go again, Democrats wanting to line their pockets at the expense of Americas safety, Democrats pushed for Obamacare with out the vote of the people, in fact did they really know what was in, or did they do it just to line their pockets from lobbyist like AARP and other Groups who will profit.

From what I see is, is that Yahoo like the rest of the news media except Fox, is in the back pocket of this Administration and will do any thing that the Democrats want them to do, and that is to Destroy the Constitution of the United States and turn this Country into a third world Country.

More on this Article in a later post when my Blood Stops Boiling.

Just remember their words in the Video.
A Trippy Idea or Fiscal Genius? Two Pols Idea to Smoke Away the Deficit video

Where does Highway Safety come in????

================================================================

A trippy idea or fiscal genius? Two pols idea to smoke away the deficit

By Olivier Knox, Jeff Zeleny, Richard Coolidge, and Jordyn Phelps – Power Players
04-30-2013

Top Line

What if the United States could shrink the federal deficit and get high at the same time? Two congressmen calling for the legalization of recreational marijuana say it’s not such a trippy idea.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) say marijuana legalization is a common sense fiscal policy that could save the government billions of dollars through a combination of tax revenues and savings from not pursuing costly enforcement and incarceration.

“We are trying to rationalize federal drug policy,” Blumenauer tells Top Line. “We’re spending too much money on enforcement for something most Americans think should be legal, and we’re losing revenue. And we’re going to create federal train wreck if we don’t fix it.”

They say the federal government is behind the curve of states like Washington and Colorado, where recreational marijuana is regulated and taxed.

“Colorado and Washington voters agree, as do I, that the proper policy with regard to marijuana is to regulate it rather than ban it,” says Polis.

Polis makes the case that marijuana should be treated no differently from “other unhealthy substances” like tobacco and alcohol. But that’s not such an easy sell in the halls of Congress, where Blumenauer and Polis face an uphill battle in getting legislation passed.

One of the main arguments against legalizing marijuana is that it can be a gateway drug to more serious illegal drugs, but Blumenauer dismisses that stance as a “red herring.”

“I haven’t been in any community where people think junior high students can’t get marijuana right now,” Blumenauer says. “If we legalize and regulate and we concentrate our energies on a policy that makes sense, we end the hypocrisy and we focus on making sure it’s not in the hands of kids.”

Blumenauer says that regulation should make it harder for underage individuals to obtain marijuana by transferring sales from illegal drug dealers to regulated businesses.

To hear more about Polis’ and Blumenauer’s efforts in to legalize marijuana, and to hear what Polis says is a shift within the Democratic Party on this issue, check out this episode of Top Line.

ABC’s Eric Wray, Betsy Klein, Alexandra Dukakis, Paul Dougherty, and Ed Jennings contributed to this episode.

Categories: America, Corruption, Democrats, Greed, Health, Money, Politics, SAFETY, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Who Gets A Poor Grade, Greedy Public Servants Who Promote Greed

Comment By Bob L
04-27-2013

Here we go again, Teachers think they are more important than people who can not afford to keep paying any more tax increases, they don’t even think about what they are teaching these kids, nothing but GREED.

These teachers need to go back in time when one teacher taught all grades, when I went to school, there were about thirty in the classes and the only ones that got the attention were the ones that were an A and B and some C students got the help, or the wealthy in the community.

Have any of you seen the Disney movie Lemmon Aid Mouth, this is how schools are run today, Sports, and Wealth get the Education that all kids should  be getting and class size should not matter.

I don’t get a pay raise or cost of living, so why are they privileged, is it because they are public servants and are entitled to every penny that comes along, bullshit, privatize the school and then lets see what they will end up with.

If a teacher is qualified, than class size should not matter, but the problem today is that teachers are lazy, look at how much home work is sent home every night, and look at how much is done in the class room. And they say kids need to be kids before they have to start looking for work, but with more home work, kids don’t have the time to be a kid.

How about Kids with who are out standing, why can’t they help, and this way it also helps that student excel more by helping other kids that have a harder time under standing, or is it that the teachers only want more money to put more people on the street in home less shelters or their cars.

What has happen to all the Bond money that people passed to support these schools with books, and maintenance, OH that is right it went to give teachers more money, not to where it was needed.

==============================================================

Teachers give Legislature poor grade at Capitol rally

KIRO 7 News
April 27, 2013

OLYMPIA, Wash. —

Teachers from around the state converged on Olympia today to deliver a combination math and social studies lesson to state lawmakers:  failing to pass a budget that improves pay for teachers equals poor quality for students.

About a thousand members of the Washington Education Association, including dozens from the Seattle area, spilled across the capitol steps in a sea of red to get the attention of lawmakers who haven’t come to a budget agreement even though the legislative session ends tomorrow.

They want a budget to provide more teachers to reduce class sizes, which they say will let them give their students more attention.

Katharine Testin teaches two French classes at different levels at West Seattle High School – at the same time. She says it’s rewarding, but hard to help each student the way she’d like to.

“Five classes, 30 kids in a class..150 kids over the course of the day… It becomes more and more difficult to get to know each kid,” she said.

And teachers say it’s about time for a raise, too.  Lawmakers have put off cost-of-living adjustments for teachers for six years.  The president of the Seattle Education Association says that makes it hard to recruit top talent.

“We need to set up an environment so that new folks coming into the profession can have confidence that they can build a career and have a livelihood that can support their families,” said SEA President Jonathan Knapp.

Gov. Jay Inslee cheered on the teachers, saying it’s time to stop asking them to make sacrifices and time to start giving them the tools they need to succeed.  He scoffed at GOP refusals to consider ending some tax breaks to raise money for schools.

“There is a right and wrong way to get money into schools and we know that,” Inslee said.  “We know we need to choose closing tax breaks and putting money into schools. That is the right way to finance education.”

But it looks as though teachers will have to wait to find out what lawmakers will do.  There’s a billion dollar difference between the budgets passed by the House and the Senate.  House Democrats want to raise taxes and use it for schools.  Senate Republicans say new taxes are a deal breaker. And with the regular session of the Legislature set to end Sunday, it appears a special session is all but a certainty.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Governor, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Money, People, Politics, Profiling, Republicans, Taxes, Unions | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Another Thorn In Americans Jobs By Government Greed

Comment By Bob L.
04-23-2013

Americans Have to Take Away ALL Governments Agencies Blank Checks and start making them do like Americans, live with in their means, if they over spend the Budget, then take it out of their pay until it is paid back, make them accountable.

Here we go again, U.S. Governments Are Anti Jobs For American Workers, it seem that this Administration does not want Americans to have a job, whether self Employed or for some one else.

No matter what you do, Government has their fingers in the problems of what is happening in this Country, for some reason, the Government does not want to see Businesses in this Country or Let Americans have any way to protect themselves by taking away guns, making regulation so tight that Companies can not survive, and by doing this there is no taxes being paid.

This Administration is doing a good job of cutting Military, Police, and Fire which is how this Country protects its self from others doing harm to others, and private citizens to protect their families when the Police or Military are not around to do what they are supposed to do.

Tax-free Internet shopping jeopardized by bill (this should say another Job Cutting Bill)


=============================================================

Tax-free Internet shopping jeopardized by bill

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER | Associated Press
04-23-2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tax-free shopping on the Internet could be in jeopardy under a bill making its way through the Senate.

The bill would empower states to require online retailers to collect state and local sales taxes for purchases made over the Internet. The sales taxes would be sent to the states where a shopper lives.

Under current law, states can only require stores to collect sales taxes if the store has a physical presence in the state. As a result, many online sales are essentially tax-free, giving Internet retailers a big advantage over brick-and-mortar stores.

The Senate voted 74 to 20 Monday to take up the bill. If that level of support continues, the Senate could pass the bill as early as this week.

Supporters say the bill is about fairness for businesses and lost revenue for states. Opponents say it would impose complicated regulations on retailers and doesn’t have enough protections for small businesses. Businesses with less than $1 million a year in online sales would be exempt.

“While local, community-based stores and shops compete for customers on many levels, including service and selection, they cannot compete on sales tax,” said Matthew Shay, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation. “Congress needs to address this disparity.”

And, he added, “Despite what the opponents say this is not a new tax.”

In many states, shoppers are required to pay unpaid sales tax when they file their state income tax returns. However, states complain that few people comply.

“I do know about three people that comply with that,” said Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., the bill’s main sponsor.

President Barack Obama supports the bill. His administration says it would help restore needed funding for education, police and firefighters, roads and bridges and health care.

But the bill’s fate is uncertain in the House, where some Republicans regard it as a tax increase. Heritage Action for America, the activist arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation, opposes the bill and will count the vote in its legislative scorecard.

“It is going to make online businesses the tax collectors for the nation,” said Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. “It really tramples on the decision New Hampshire has made not to have a sales tax.”

Many of the nation’s governors — Republicans and Democrats — have been lobbying the federal government for years for the authority to collect sales taxes from online sales, said Dan Crippen, executive director of the National Governors Association. Those efforts intensified when state tax revenues took a hit from the recession and the slow economic recovery.

“It’s a matter of equity for businesses,” Crippen said. “It’s a matter of revenue for states.”

The issue is getting bigger for states as more people make purchases online. Last year, Internet sales in the U.S. totaled $226 billion, up nearly 16 percent from the previous year, according to Commerce Department estimates.

The bill pits brick-and-mortar stores like Wal-Mart against online services such as eBay. Amazon.com, which initially fought efforts in some states to make it collect sales taxes, supports it too. Amazon and Best Buy have joined a group of retailers called the Marketplace Fairness Coalition to lobby on behalf of the bill.

“Amazon.com has long supported a simplified nationwide approach that is evenhandedly applied and applicable to all but the smallest-volume sellers,” Paul Misener, Amazon’s vice president of global public policy, said in a recent letter to senators.

On the other side, eBay has been rallying customers to oppose the bill.

“I hope you agree that imposing unnecessary tax burdens on small online businesses is a bad idea,” eBay President and CEO John Donahoe said in a letter to customers. “Join us in letting your members of Congress know they should protect small online businesses, not potentially put them out of business.”

The bill is also opposed by senators from states that have no sales tax, including Sens. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

Baucus said the bill would require relatively small Internet retailers to comply with sales tax laws in thousands of jurisdictions.

“This legislation doesn’t help businesses expand and grow and hire more employees,” Baucus said. “Instead, it forces small businesses to hire expensive lawyers and accountants to deal with the burdensome paperwork and added complexity of tax rules and filings across multiple states.”

But Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said the bill requires participating states to make it relatively easy for Internet retailers to comply. States must provide free computer software to help retailers calculate sales taxes, based on where shoppers live. States must also establish a single entity to receive Internet sales tax revenue, so retailers don’t have to send them to individual counties or cities.

“We’re way beyond the quill pen and ledger days,” Durbin said. “Thanks to computers and thanks to software it is not that complex.”

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Taxes, Unemployed, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

U.S. Governments Are Anti Jobs For American Workers

Comment By Bob L.
04-23-2013

Federal, States, Counties, and Cities are Anti jobs for American workers, if you have not noticed these organisations will do any thing to bring Foreign workers in to this Country to line some ones pockets.

Just think how many jobs and lives this will affect, but these groups don’t care just as long as it does not affect their jobs. The problem is that it does affect every ones job one way or another, whether you know it or not, and with the brain washing going on in this Country today, people are getting dumber and dumber, and a lot of this brain washing starts in Schools and Colleges.

How many times have you heard any of them turn down these people and say that we need to put Americans to work first, this is ALL Legal Americans the only ones that I have heard is the people protesting trying to protect and save their jobs, but on the other hand, the next ones to protest any or new jobs or save jobs are Environmentalists, and Special Interest, it seems to be that they have a job, they don’t care if any one else has one.
(All legal Americans are People who have come to this Country and become legal and not SNUCK in on a visa or Across the Border)

Look how many people have been laid off so these Companies could bring in Foreign workers, look how many have had to train workers for THEIR jobs so the Company could go over seas or down size just to hire people on work .

Then you have Governments that want more money because they are running Businesses out and can not figure out why, and then on top of that they won’t let new businesses come in unless they meet stiff standards. 

=============================================================

Cities, tribes: No coal port, no coal trains here

Posted By Joel Connelly
April 22, 2013

Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn, oft-faulted for a go-it-alone governing style, became a coalition builder Monday, joining with other city officials and Indian tribes in a new organization designed to build opposition to location of big coal export terminals in Northwest waters.

In an interview, McGinn suggested that the newly formed Leadership Alliance Against Coal will seek outside, non-governmental funding.  Seattle has already done a transportation study on the impact of having as 18 coal trains, each as long as a mile-and-a-half, plying the waterfront each day.

The city is now doing an economic impact study, and the Puget Sound Regional Council has said it will examine various impacts of the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point north of Bellingham, which would receive coal from Wyoming and Montana and export it to China.

“These coal trains threaten the health of our communities, the strength of our economies and the environmental and cultural heritage we share:  We stand together to stop the coal trains,”  McGinn said during an Earth Day announcement event.

Earlier, McGinn won a big round of applause during dedication of the Bullitt Center, the world “greenest” commercial office building, when he declared:  “We can export this clean energy technology, instead of coal.”

Brian Cladoosby, chairman of the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, and one of the state’s most influential native American leaders, declared.  “For thousands of years, Washington State tribes have fought to protect all that is important for those who call this  great state home.  We can no longer allow industry and business to pollute our water and land:  We as leaders need to protect our treaty resources, our economies, and the human health of our citizens and neighbors.l”

The coal port battle is likely to become the Northwest’s most intense land — and water — use battle in almost 40 years.  It is taking on strong similarity to the years-long 1970′s battle over whether to locate a “superport” and pipeline terminus to receive and ship out oil from the trans-Alaska pipeline.

Losing business to natural gas, the coal industry has turned to its Wyoming and Montana mines, and to the export market, to revitalize its economic fortunes.  Environmental groups claim coal trains would harm rather than help the Northwest’s economy.  Govs. Jay Inslee of Washington and John Kitzhaber of Oregon want the Obama administration to study impacts on climate change.

Using a longtime industry tactic, supporters of the coal terminal proposals — Big Coal, the railroad industry, and some industrial unions — have formed an “astroturf” grass roots group called the Northwest Alliance for Energy and Jobs.  The pro-coal forces have blanketed Northwest TV with commercials and hired supposedly “green” public relations firms.

The opposition has started at the grassroots level, and spread.

The alliance announced by McGinn and Cladoosby includes city officials from Marysville, Shoreline, Spokane, Edmonds, Sumner, Bainbridge Island and Seattle . . . as well as officials from the Tulalip Tribes, Lummi Indians, Spokane Indians, and the Swinomish Indians.

Spokane City Council President Ben Stuckart said:  “The city of Spokane cannot afford to have additional coal trains coming through that disrupt truck routes, emergency services and the health of our citizens.  In addition, we must address climate change as elected leaders and must take action.”

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is expected soon to announce its scoping plan for environmental studies on the proposed coal ports, a key step given that evaluations could be narrow — limited to impacts near the ports — or region-wide.

Categories: America, Corruption, Democrats, Education, Greed, Jobs, Obama, People, Personal Freedoms, Politics, Republicans, Rich, Unemployed, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

So you want to Give up your Second Amendment Rights for Safety

Comment By Bob L.
04-17-2013

My Condolences go out to those in Boston and hope this does not happen again, but with a Government that thinks that there is nothing wrong and nothing to worry about, this makes me a little nervous, and what is this Administration hiding from the American people.

It could be a GUN, KNIFE, BOMB, or even a LETTER laced with a deadly Powder, so how is Tighter Gun Control going to make it Safer.

Knife attack at Texas college was random
Rick Jervis, USA TODAY  April 10, 2013

All this could have easily been in a school, don’t say it can not happen, they get in with a Gun, why not a Knife, or a Bomb, can they say it can not happen, NO, it could be a Student, Teacher, Janitor, a Maintenance Worker for the School, it could even be a person that has a lot of power in this Country, you can not tell who is out to destroy this Country, and being that they let people just waltz in and not knowing who they are, or who crossed the Border, or who came in by plane.

Just think this Country lets a lot come in on work visas, and not knowing who they really are.

Here is why we don’t want to lose our rights to protect our selves, if we do, than we will not have a chance for protection from terrorist, so think about what you will lose by taking this away, is this what you want, a Country open to whom ever wants to take away your freedom, I sure don’t want to see it, and I don’t want to see our kids left holding the bag for FREEDOM.

If you are really Educated and are smart, you will not let this happen and let your kids fight to keep this country free from more slavery and death from standing up to what is now happening in this Country, what is it TWO Bombs and Possibly a third in Boston, and now letters with powder in them, could it be a member of your family next.

Now that they are trying for gun rights, how about a Knife, or Bomb laws, OH, that is right, there is already laws on the books, and they don’t want to Enforce them, they would rather make a new law that they will not Enforce, how can they, they spend more money on every thing else and keep cutting their Law Enforcement  and Fire Personal. SO, Where Does Safety for the people who put them in to Office Come In.

==============================================================

‘Soft targets’ from sea to shining sea

By Allen G. Breed - of Associated Press
04-17-2013

As Monday’s bombings at the Boston Marathon illustrate, America is, from sea to shining sea, a nation of “soft targets,” full of opportunities for those who want to do it harm.

 When her cousin and 11 others were gunned down at an Aurora, Colo., movie theater last July, Anita Busch lost all interest in her favorite television crime dramas. And when she heard that three people had been shot dead at an Oregon shopping mall in December, she stopped her Christmas shopping and sneaked out the back door of a department store.

“After Aurora, even my little niece who’s 11 was afraid to go into a mall, to go shopping,” the Los Angeles woman says. “I look around all the time. I think everyone does.”

The United States proclaims itself the world’s foremost economic and military superpower — the mightiest nation on Earth, “land of opportunity” for those who want to work hard and prosper. But as Monday’s bombings at the Boston Marathon illustrate, the reality is that, from sea to shining sea, this is a nation of “soft targets,” full of opportunities for those who want to do it harm.

And so the message Tamara Ruben sought to convey to her third- through seventh-graders as they celebrated Israeli Independence Day Tuesday at Temple Beth El Mekor Chayim outside New York City was to not let fear rule them — “that as much as possible not to let this event to dictate our daily life and make us afraid and paranoid and change drastically our style of life.”

“Enjoy the simple things — the simple things that give us contentment and joy in life,” says Ruben, director of the synagogue’s school.

Like Busch, so many Americans have a visceral reaction when the backdrops of everyday life — a school, a supermarket, a mall, a sporting event — become places of violence and tears. The Boston bombings had Tricia Kaye second-guessing, if only briefly, her decision to participate in her fifth Chicago Marathon this October.

“I had that kind of gut reaction that there’s no way to secure a race like that, and that it’s better not to do it,” said the 35-year-old Chicagoan, who works for a national financial planning company. “But it quickly changed to ‘Screw that, I’m going to do it.’”

Lt. Christopher Shane Henderson, a firefighter and paramedic in St. Petersburg, Fla., says he can’t take his 20-month-old daughter to the circus or a fair without the specter of 9/11 or some other tragedy casting a pall.

“This absolutely impacts how you view people,” the 33-year-old father says. “I think it’s pretty disgusting that people can’t go to places and enjoy things with our families without the idea lingering in our heads that somebody has malintent.”

Psychologist Timothy Strauman says these reactions are only too natural. Growing up in Philadelphia in the late 1950s and early ’60s, Strauman remembers the “duck and cover” drills and the signs pointing out the nearest nuclear fallout shelter.

“What we felt then was, you know, the WORLD could come to an end,” says Strauman, a professor at Duke University in Durham, N.C. “Mutually assured destruction — that was the policy.”

Personally, Strauman — who specializes in depression and anxiety — feels much safer today.

“Anytime a high-profile event like this occurs, one of the things that it does is it makes people think that the event is likely to happen again,” he says. “It changes our sense of how likely this is to occur … and so it makes it very difficult for people in the immediate aftermath to stop and realize that it’s still an extraordinarily rare event.”

It doesn’t feel that way, says Busch. Her cousin, Micayla Medek, was just 23 when she died in a hail of semi-automatic gunfire during a premiere for “Dark Knight Rises” at the Century 16 cinema last year. Busch listens in despair as politicians debate whether to debate tighter restrictions on high-powered weapons with high-capacity magazines.

Categories: America, Democrats, Freedom, Health, Obama, People, Personal Freedoms, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Is This Country Only Free For Politicians and Public Servants?

Comment By Bob L.
04-12-2013

How dumb can this get, did Obama get his education at Hitler University where every thing is censored until it is law. And have you noticed that the Government is now in control of the news media and controlling what they say, if not then it is the people giving the news or the station owners that are pushing their own beliefs on the American people.

MH900431560How can you spend One Trillion Dollars a year for four years or less and recoupe your losses in Ten years with taxes of One Trillion Dollars, what type of math is this,  is this that new math that they are teaching now that is putting this Country behind other Countries in education, or is it to much Testing, home work and no class room Teaching.

Have you ever noticed that every thing about this Country that politicians are exempt from  laws that they pass, like Taxes, Health Care, NOT Paying their taxes, and with Penalties and Interest that Americans have to pay. How many are still delinquent and have not brought them current.

President Obama’s Weirdest New Taxes
By CHRIS GOOD | ABC OTUS News

=========================================================

Obama tax blueprint opening gambit in potential tax rewrite

By Kim Dixon | Reuters
Wed, Apr 10

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama on Wednesday revived a list of his favorite tax ideas, hoping to raise $580 billion in new revenues from the wealthy over a decade in a potential opening gambit to forge a deal with Congress to overhaul the tax code.

While certain not to move forward en masse, his 2014 budget blueprint has elements likely to spur discussion, including a proposal to tax derivatives more stringently, as lawmakers weigh a tax code revamp and face a deadline on the government’s debt limit this summer.

“These are all opening bids in any potential grand bargain, so from that perspective they are important,” said Chris Krueger, an analyst at Guggenheim Partners.

Congressional Republicans largely blasted the Democratic president’s budget proposal, highlighting the difficulty policymakers have had forging a long-term deficit-cutting plan.

Obama’s budget does not seek to raise individual tax rates as he has proposed in prior budgets. For years, he sought to raise rates on household income above $250,000.

Obama and most Republicans agreed during last year’s fiscal cliff battle to raise rates for households earning more than $450,000 a year, to 39.6 percent from 35 percent.

A senior administration official said on Wednesday the White House preferred not to “re-litigate” that fight.

Obama’s budget also proposes a new “Buffett tax,” a minimum tax rate for the wealthy, named for investor Warren Buffett, that phases in a minimum 30 percent tax rate on household income above $1 million.

The bid revives Obama’s offer last year to Republican House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner during the talks to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff of looming tax hikes.

The budget also reprised a proposal to cap tax breaks among wealthier taxpayers, starting at household income of roughly $250,000, limiting the value of deductions and loopholes in determining taxable income. A phased-in limit on deductions is now part of the tax code for more affluent taxpayers.

The new cap would apply to the same list of breaks proposed in years past, including the charitable tax break and the exemption for municipal bond interest.

Boehner last year said he could back raising new revenue through curbing deductions, though he now rules out new revenue.

One battle Obama proposed to fight again is over the estate tax, pitching to raise it to 45 percent for estates worth over $3.5 million, after a deal to cap it in January at 40 percent for estates over $5 million.

The budget also ends a tax break for “carried interest” profits earned by fund managers like those who run private equity and other investment firms, officials said.

In a bid to attract Republicans, Obama proposed changing the inflation calculation for Social Security benefits to help shore up the finances of the public pension program, which would raise revenue and curb benefits.

That proposal also would push people more quickly into higher tax categories, as their income rises faster than the brackets are adjusted.

CORPORATE BREAKS A TARGET

Top tax-writers in Congress are working on a tax rewrite, but the process is fraught with disagreement over details and whether to raise new revenue in the process.

Prominent in the budget are proposals to raise hundreds of billions of dollars from U.S. multinational corporations that avert tax on income held overseas. Obama seeks to raise about $157 billion over a decade with these measures.

These include limiting the ability of corporations to defer tax on foreign income and tightening foreign tax credit rules.

Obama also sought more revenue by curbing energy tax breaks, and proposed an end to a tax advantage for corporate jets.

“It doesn’t mean the administration is not open to a deal,” said Michael Mundaca, Obama’s top tax official in the Treasury Department during his first term and now co-director of national tax at Ernst & Young. “It is just that they may not be going to negotiate through the budget.”

There were a few areas of potential agreement with Republicans. Obama pitched changing the taxation of derivatives to mark them to a market price yearly for taxation purposes, which he says will raise $19 billion over a decade.

That proposal largely mirrors one put forward by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp. But that idea is part of a plan to drastically cut individual tax rates, which most Democrats have not signed onto.

Another area that suggested compromise to some was Obama’s call for “revenue-neutral” business tax reform, something he had been unclear on in the past.

“If he had taken a lot of corporate expenditures and used that for deficit reduction, that would really spell doom for tax reform,” said Gabe Horwitz, director of the economic program at the Democratic centrist group Third Way.

The cuts to corporate breaks are counterbalanced by proposals to double a tax credit for small start-up companies and extend a business research and development tax credit. Obama also wants to expand a child care tax credit.

The president has backed cutting the top U.S. corporate tax rate to 28 percent from 35 percent, now the highest in the industrialized world. But most companies do not pay the top rate after taking advantage of numerous tax breaks.

(Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh, Howard Goller, Tim Dobbyn and Todd Eastham)

Categories: America, Corruption, Greed, Money, Obama, People, Republicans, Rich, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

For Get About U.S. Education, Continually Pay Teachers to Do Nothing

Comment By Bob L.
04-11-2013

We can not sit back and let people who can not even come up with a budget or Balance Americas Check Book tell our Schools what to do, it is time that we Americans, take back our Schools and get the Federal Government, the States,  Special Interest and the Unions out of our Schools.

And now you have lunatics saying that our kids don’t belong to us and that they belong to the Community, I don’t know about you, but I had to buy every thing for my own kids, I did not get any money to raise them from the Community. (Take their guns away from THEM) Is this what College Education is teaching today, Lunacy, Dumb, and Stupid.

Schools should be spending more time on Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic, every one of these head you in the right direction, we should not be teaching any thing else until you get in to the Eight Grade, then you start them on a trade.

This is why our kids are failing in this Country,because they are more interested to bring in Foreigners to do the jobs that Americans should be doing.

This Country has turned their backs on Education for Americans to Educate people from around the world, until they close the door there will not be a good Education program in this country.

Just look at how they want to give people from outside this country cheaper education while our kids pay more to go to college and school.

Why not lower the rates to our students instead of charging more so that they can bring people from outside this Country to get a better education then what our kids are getting, is this why our kids are failing, is this why our Teachers and Government are holding back out kids so this country can be left behind.

There is definitely some thing rotten going on in this Country when   Companies, the Rich, and the Government should be spending more time with this Country, but they want to hand out Work Visas, and turn their backs on American Worker and their Education.

===========================================================

Zuckerberg launches immigration reform advocacy group

By Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News – The Ticket
04-11-2013

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is joining with top Silicon Valley CEOs to launch a political advocacy group called FWD.us that, among other things, will urge lawmakers to pass immigration reform.

Politico reports that Linkedin co-founder Reid Hoffman and Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer are among the group’s major contributors. Former staffers in the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations have joined the group as well.

Before launching FWD.us, Zuckerberg had dipped a toe into politics when he donated $100 million to the struggling school system in Newark, N.J. He also held a fundraiser for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican, in February.

High-profile techies have argued that the current legal immigration system does not allow them to attract and retain high-skilled immigrants from around the world. In March, executives from Facebook, Google, eBay and dozens more tech companies sent a letter to President Barack Obama urging him to add more visas for high-tech workers.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Governor, Jobs, Local Governments, Money, Obama, Politics, Republicans, Taxes, Unions, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Let’s Put Them In Their Place, Show Them What They Will Get!

Comment By Bob L.
04-08-2013

Environmentalist, Special Interest, and Government Agencies who want Clean Air, Clean Water, and Streets Clean of Automobiles, lets give it to them, plain and simple.

Lets give them No Electricity, No Water, No Oil, No Gas, this includes Propane, Natural Gas, kerosene.

Now let’s go a little farther, can these people survive without any of these things mentioned, some will say yes, but can they, good, but one thing that will shut them down is food, do they have a place to grow their Food? do they have a Job,? not if they get what they want, they will be sitting on their thumb and NO Place to go.

If they think that the Government will help, they have another thing coming, if no one is working where is the money going to come from to help? Not even the Government Agencies will know what to do with an Empty bank, people will be in the same place that they were in 1929 to 1940.

And by giving them what they want means it will ground all Planes, cars, and Trains, so does any one have an idea on what to do if these people get what they want, one thing that will happen is that all people will have to work hand in hand no matter who you are.

People had better have a second thought before they go any farther on wanting, these people  have already wanted to much to where this Country is about to go BANKRUPT, and they will have no one to blame but themselves.

If you LIKE and agree , PASS this on.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, SAFETY, Taxes, Unemployed, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Better transit funding, NO, They They Will Never Stop Wanting More

Comment By Bob L.
04-03-2013

These Transit Companies will never stop wanting more money if you keep giving to their continued waste. And look who is promoting it. (Transit Riders Union)

It time that any one who makes over Seventy Thousand Dollars, they have two ways, START Paying that money back to the taxpayers OR Put It Back into the Transit Company for which these people were over paid, NO Public Servant Deserves that much in Pay, WHY??

They say that: “It is the elderly, the low-income, the blind and visually impaired, people with other handicapping conditions, people who do not drive and the young, who suffer the most, THIS IS TRUE, but also what they are not saying, is that any Increase in taxes and other ways of funding will also hurt the same people ether way you go.

Here are some ways that it affects these people, Rent, Food, Utilities, and Cost of riding the Bus, and these people don’t get any way to Increase their Income like every one else when taxes go up.

I know what happens, if you don’t qualify for a special pass, then you have to walk to a bus stop that could be a block away, but not all can walk that far, like where I live, I live a block away from a bus stop, now to go to town fine, but on the return, I have to cross a busy street with no light to cross, and this street is a public highway, now here is the catch, I use crutches to walk short distances, and a power chair to go any farther, now tell me why I should support more transit Companies, oh did I say Companies, yes I have to subsidize two transit Companies, so don’t tell me that I have to pay more Taxes for them to waste on higher wages.

==========================================================

Better transit funding goal of marchers at Magnolia bridge event Saturday

The Seattle Times

Originally published Wednesday, April 3, 2013

A march across the Magnolia bridge in support of better transit funding is scheduled for late Saturday, according to event organizers.

The event, organized by the Transit Riders Union, begins at 11 p.m. near Staples, at the east end of the bridge, and ends at the Magnolia Village Pub, 3221 W. McGraw St.

Magnolia was chosen because of a schedule change last fall, when King County Metro Transit dropped service after 9:30 p.m. from downtown to Magnolia, then restored a 10:20 p.m. trip after riders objected.

“It is the elderly, the low-income, the blind and visually impaired, people with other handicapping conditions, people who do not drive and the young, who suffer the most when there is no public transportation,” according to an announcement by Magnolia advocate Jim McIntosh.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Money, People, Politics, Taxes | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Wages Stink in America for Most, Even if You Went to College

Comment By Bob L.
04-02-2013

I posted this article, Is It called Pigs or Greed, I have extended another article to this, Wages Stink, these Public Servants who are whining about losing a days pay should be thankful that they are getting what they are getting paid, Fifty Thousand a year or better, there are a lot of people who would love to get that much a year, but are held back by working for the Private Sector not as a Public Servant, if a public servant worked under the same conditions as the private sector they would be lucky that they even had a job.

Comment By Bob L.
03-28-2013

Let these public cry babies find out what it is like to not have a job and find out that private employment does not have job security, and they should not have any more job security than any one else.

Private sector does not have automatic pay raises or cost of living, they don’t have good medical, and they don’t have JOB SECURITY.

(Anxiety is rising among civilian workers at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, who stand to lose up to a fifth of their pay)

It is not just Public Servants it is all Elected Government Agencies that don’t know the meaning of money and its worth who keep spending and handing out pay and medical to them selves and Public Servants like water.

Is It called Pigs or Greed that this Country now runs on, every time you turn around some Public Servant is complaining about losing one days pay or they don’t make enough, but they never think about the people who don’t even have a job and living on four times less than them, AND where their PAY CHECKS come from, it makes me sick to hear people talking like this, you would think that they would be trying to help people get back to work, because if this keeps up even public servants will be losing their jobs, for lack of tax money to pay their wages, then what will they do sue the taxpayer for not keeping them in a better life style.

=========================================================

Wages Stink at America’s Most Common Jobs

CNNMoney.com
By Tami Luhby | CNNMoney.com
Mon, Apr 1, 2013

America’s most common jobs come with lousy pay.

Workers in seven of the 10 largest occupations typically earn less than $30,000 a year, according to new data published Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s a far cry from the nation’s average annual pay of $45,790.

Food prep workers are the third most-common job in the U.S., but have the lowest pay, at a mere $18,720 a year for 2012. Cashiers and waiters are also popular professions, but the average pay at these jobs tallies up to less than $21,000 annually. There are 4.3 million retail sales workers out there, making them the most common job, but the position pays only $25,310 for the year.

Among the 10 most popular professions, only the nation’s 2.6 million registered nurses earn a good living, bringing home nearly $68,000 a year on average. Another two of the most common jobs — secretaries and customer service representatives — have an average annual wage of about $33,000.

Wages have been in the spotlight this year as the debate over income inequality intensified. Middle-class Americans have been losing ground, as median household income dropped by more than $4,000 since 2000.

Part of this decline stems from a disappearance of middle-class jobs and an explosion of lower-paying ones. Some 58% of the jobs created during the recovery have been low-wage positions, according to a 2012 report by the National Employment Law Project. These low-wage jobs had a median hourly wage of $13.83 or less.

President Obama has been pushing to raise the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour, and several states are considering increasing their minimum wages.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Greed, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, Taxes, Unemployed, Unions, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment
 
 

Transit Systems, Self Supporting or Close Them

Comment By Bob L.
04-01-2013

It is about time that these transit systems start being more depending on rider ship and not the taxpayer, these systems keep getting bigger and Bigger and then expect the taxpayer not the riders to pay for their operation.

If you have not noticed we the taxpayer is now paying for King County Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, and Sound Transit, then you have Everett, and Thurston Counties, so when are they going to start being self-supporting just like the Washington State, and Pierce County parks, and we can not for get Alcohol.
It is time to stop throwing money into a losing programs, if they can not make it on their own then shut them down, if they can not support at least 90% of their operations, but it seem that they are depending on the taxpayer to fund them, and the riders to pay their outrageous wages. Cut all Wages and even at the Top, then maybe, but untill they start cutting waste, no more taxpayer money or tax increases, if a person had an education they would know that if it can not support it’s self you close it, and these transit systems depend on the taxpayer to support their habits and life styles.
Here is an Example:

Tacoma News Tribune
Fired former worker sues Pierce Transit

A man hired at an annual salary of more than $100,000 by Pierce Transit in 2012 now is suing the agency, claiming it improperly fired him after learning of his criminal record.

========================================================

King County Metro estimates 17 percent of bus service could be cut

KIRO 7
Monday, April 1, 2013

SEATTLE

Officials with King County Metro Transit will discuss Monday morning the potential service cuts and what riders could face if Metro cannot obtain a stable revenue source.

King County Metro Transit is facing a $75 million annual budget gap starting in 2014, and there are a couple reasons for it.

First, $32 million in mitigation funding from the state is running out.

The funds were for all the extra route changes and problems associated with the Alaskan Way tunnel construction, but the money is going to be gone before the tunnel is finished.

Another problem is the extra $20 car tab fee for transit, which was only a two-year stopgap measure and expires in 2014.

Metro is asking legislators in Olympia and King County Council for help coming up with a long-term funding solution.

Seventeen percent of bus service will face cuts and revisions if they cannot obtain a stable source.

At 10 a.m. Monday, Metro officials will meet to discuss funding solutions and which routes could be cut back or cut out completely.

Metro operates 217 routes and is the ninth largest transit system in the country. Ithas a fleet of 1,400 buses that carried 115 million passengers in 2012, which was Metro’s second highest in ridership.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Money, People, Republicans, Taxes, Unions, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

With HIGH TAXES and NO JOBS, Why are There Homeless People?

Comment By Bob L.
03-31-2013

Here is a good example of what Government and Businesses are doing in this Country, they all sit on their backsides and say why are there home less around our Cities, just because they have a steady job or good retirement, not all people are that lucky, well if they are that uniformed and Stupid, than they should not be in politics, it is these people who are putting people on the streets, most people don’t do it themselves, some do because they are lazy and don’t want to work and they want some one else to support them.

Lets start with the Government: Misuse of tax money, WHAT, yes they miss use money that the people intrust them with in taxes to take care of Cities, Counties, States, and we can not forget the Federal side, One, they are paying and feeding people to stay home and not work, Two, they let YUPPIES, Special Interest, Lobbyist, and Environmentalist run them and waste money on things they want, not what the money is support to be used for.

Businesses: they should be first but I will put them last, they are so greedy that they will do any thing to put more money on their wallet than keeping people working and having a good wage and health plan to live on, they seem to think that people not working will buy their products, it seems that the only ones that are buying are the people who these Government Agencies are paying to stay home.

Here is a good one to remember, NO MONEY, NO PLACE TO CALL HOME except the streets of some City around the world, so if you want to stop homelessness, create good jobs, NOT computer run jobs.

It is not just Puyallup it is all around the world, it is Governments and Businesses that are creating the problem.

=================================================

Puyallup residents, city council seek solutions to homelessness problem

By ANDREW FICKES; The Herald
Published: 03/28/13

In recent months the homeless population has become noticeably more acute in Puyallup’s downtown, so much so that Puyallup city councilmembers have received an influx of emails attesting to the impacts.

On Tuesday, March 26, it all came to a head at a study session of the city council where dozens of people representing the homeless and those residents and business owners being impacted attended to testify on what they believe should be done.

“It’s an issue that we’re all very aware of,” said Puyallup Mayor Rick Hansen. “It’s about the health, safety and welfare of our citizens.”

Freezing Nights, the only overnight shelter program for homeless individuals in east Pierce County from Nov. 1 through March 31, was under heavy scrutiny by some Puyallup residents Tuesday night who blamed the program for excaberating the homeless problem in downtown Puyallup.

Brackman said she understands people’s discomfort with the homeless population affecting neighborhoods and businesses.

“I’ve been extremely aware of problems that people have had and their concerns are valid,” Brackman said. “The problem is, there is no alternative place for homeless people in Puyallup. So, there is a problem that Freezing Nights is getting the blame. We have become this scape goat. And those who attend or associate with Freezing Nights get demonized.”

Brackman joined the voices of many at the Tuesday night meeting that called for city council to act on assembling a task force to look at the problems associated with homelessness in Puyallup and to identify solutions that would work for everyone.

Puyallup City Council unanimously agreed that forming a task force should be the next step in attacking this problem head on. Councilmember John Hopkins praised the good that Freezing Nights does for the homeless.

“The program is so good, we’re a vicitim of our own success,” Hopkins said. “It’s a dreadful problem that is affecting everyone.”

Read a full report of this story in the April 3 print edition of the Herald.

Reporter Andrew Fickes can be reached at 253-552-7001 or by email at andrew.fickes@puyallupherald.com. Follow him on Twitter, @herald_andrew.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Home Less, Money, Obama, People, Republicans, Taxes, Unemployed, Unions, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Is It Pigs or Greed in the World Today, Hard to Tell

Comment By Bob L.
03-28-2013

Let these public cry babies find out what it is like to not have a job and find out that private employment does not have job security, and they should not have any more job security than any one else.

Private sector does not have automatic pay raises, they don’t have good medical, and they don’t have JOB SECURITY.

(Anxiety is rising among civilian workers at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, who stand to lose up to a fifth of their pay)

It is not just Public Servants it is all Elected Government Agencies that don’t know the meaning of money and its worth who keep spending and handing out pay and medical to them selves and Public Servants like water.

Is It called Pigs or Greed that this Country now runs on, every time you turn around some Public Servant is complaining about losing one days pay or they don’t make enough, but they never think about the people who don’t even have a job and living on four times less than them, AND where their PAY CHECKS come from, it makes me sick to hear people talking like this, you would think that they would be trying to help people get back to work, because if this keeps up even public servants will be losing their jobs, for lack of tax money to pay their wages, then what will they do sue the taxpayer for not keeping them in a better life style.

I am going to use the term good old boys term so don’t get upset, but what I would like to know is, can I use the term WOMEN or WOMAN because if the ones complaining about the names, Mailman, Policeman, or Fireman, if that is the case then we can not use the term Woman or Women because there is the name MAN or MEN in it, so I say get over yourselves and get on with your lives and stop trying to change things that have been for Centuries, the same thing goes for every thing else, leave alone what is and has been for years, stop trying to change it because YOU don’t like it.

If You Don’t Like It, LEAVE, and don’t let the door hit you on your ass when you leave to find a better world, like they say the grass IS NOT always greener on the other side, if it was, YOU would not be here today trying to stay in this Country.

But Greed in this country is getting worse, lets look at nascar and  how greed has taken over that, it has put the spectator at risk, you might not think so, but look at most accidents that happen are cased by blocking, I under stand that you are not allowed to block in open wheel racing, why not nascar, then we might get down to some good racing, and even at the finish, but when blocking or pushing another into the wall, that is not racing, that is down right greed.

Take tha two that happened that went up in to the stands, both were the because of trying to block, not to put down any women in racing, but car races are no longer a weekend sport, it has become a cut throat greed for money not a good old boys sport that it use to be, it has become a win, or you lose your ride or your sponsor, but you have some good drivers out there and some of them are women who have proven that they can drive as good as the men

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Local Governments, Money, Obama, People, Taxes, Unemployed, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Senate Took 4 Years, When At One Time They Had 2 Years Full Control

Comment By Bob L.
03-23-2013

How about that the Senate finally got off their butts and finally passed a budget in four years, Now Wait a Minute, they did not do it for the Country, they did it for them selves, because of elections coming up in 2014 and are afraid for their job, this shows that they don’t care about this Country one red cent, and shows that they only got elected for the money, not the people who elected them.

Did these people ever go to School? I can not see how you can pay off a debt by spending more money with nothing coming in, I guess what I learned in school was just waisted time when I could have continued working full-time then go to school, but what I learned in school was that if you spent more than you make, you have to pay it back or you go in to debt, but I guess that was wrong according to the way our Government looks at how debt works, lets see if you, lets say you make $10.00 dollars an hour and spend $20.00 dollars of that $10.00 dollars, over time you won’t have a debt to pay back?, from the way I see it, this is how the Government thinks, 2+2= 40 Two Dollars in taxes, put that Two Dollars in to the General Fund means Forty Dollars can be spent, that is Government Math. (Lack of, or over Education)

Every time Government talks about Entitlements they go against the people who will get hurt the most, but I have not seen or heard about the Entitlements that the Government and other organisations receives every year, they always go after the ones that will get hurt the most so they will pass more taxes so they can spend more on trash, junk, or other Countries, but not in this Country where it is needed. 

A Canadian said it right in the 70′s, http://youtu.be/oJ_okAgAUGE     and Americans have let it go on, they have become lazy, and not caring about the Country they live in (greed has taken control), they have let the Government take over their lives and every thing they do, they have not stood up against Government when they are told that their vote does not count, and the same thing when the Courts side with what Government wants, and let them get away with it, it is time that Americans get a Back Bone and stand up to the Government, Environmentalist, Special Interest Groups, and Religion Haters, and take OUR Country back, other wise, you get what you ask for, NOTHING,  but A Corrupt out of control Dictator Government.

From what I can see and hear, is that some Americans are so wrapped up in believing the lies that they can not see the real truth, and they continually believe there is nothing wrong in this Country, and at this point they can not see that this Country is in the process of going Bankrupt and headed for a Great Great Depression, or controlled by a Dictator, but it seems that they could care less as long as the Government does not make them go out and find a job, and as long they keeps giving them money to stay home and do nothing for it.

====================================================================

Senate narrowly passes first budget in four years

By David Lawder | Reuters
03-23-2013

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Senate on Saturday narrowly passed its first federal budget in four years, a move that will usher in a relative lull in Washington’s fiscal wars until an anticipated summer showdown over raising the debt ceiling.  MORE

Categories: America, Corruption, Democrats, Greed, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

$42 Million Pledge for Food, For Immigrants

Comment By Bob L.
03-20-2013

These States (along with the Federal Government) are complaining about where they are going to come up with money to run the state, because they are in debt to the tune of  what ever they can come up with so they can raise taxes, well this is because they do not have the brains to say no on what should be spendable and non spendable when it comes to spending money on crap because some YUPPY wants it, they waste no time spending money they do not have, so they raise Taxes, this is all Government Agencies know what to do, spend and tax, know matter what the outcome is, now or in the future of the State, their Kids or Grandkids, to them it looks good on paper.

Any one who goes into Government usually has a silver spoon in their mouth and does not know the meaning of money, and these people go to college on the taxpayer because mommy and daddy want to teach them how to save their money and live on the taxpayers money, a few who came up from the poor have a better handle on what money is and know where it should be spent, but after some get into politics they turn their backs on the people who believed in them to elect them, and that same thing goes today, screw the LEGAL American CITIZENS who put them there.

If people had a job there would be no reason to be handing out money, Oh, that is right I forgot, there are no jobs for the main reason that government has Licencing, Regulations, and taxes restricting them from wanting to do business here and staying, and wanting to go other places where it is cheaper to operate.

Like these Businesses say, the bottom line is more Important than providing jobs, with that mentality, NO JOBS means NO MONEY to SPEND for their bottom line, to line their Own Pockets. Same for Governments on Taxes. ( Circle of Greed brings Crashes to the Economy )

===================================================================

OlympianLogo_1008

25 Senate lawmakers sign onto $42 million pledge for food aid in next state budget

By Brad Shannon – The Olympian
March 19, 2013

The Senate goes first with a budget at the Washington Capitol this year, and the Republican-dominated Senate Majority Coalition is keeping pretty mum on its spending plans. But the coalition does plan to put out a budget in another week – well after tomorrow’s quarterly revenue forecast. In the meantime, there is a growing list of lawmakers or groups declaring what must be in the budget.

The latest is from the Children’s Alliance, aided by Republican Sen. Joe Fain of Auburn, who took the lead in rounding up signatures from 25 Senate members – a majority – in support of $42 million for the food assistance program . It was more than an exercise of job skills by the majority coalition’s floor leader; Fain had met during the legislative interim last year with immigrants in his legislative district who were struggling with cuts in the food aid program, according to the alliance.

Jon Gould, deputy director of the Alliance, said Fain led the effort but got help from  Democratic Sen. Andy Billig of Spokane and also Democratic Sen. Rosemary McAuliffe of Bothell. The $42 million would double what the state now is putting into the program, which had been cut in half during the 2011-13 budget cycle, and that meant families that rely on the food aid were given half as much.

The alliance estimates 14,000 kids in immigrant families lost help. Gould said the cuts meant families that rely on the food aid were given half as much – about $78 on average in November versus $159 in June before the cuts.

In a news release from the alliance, Fain is quoted as saying: “The data is clear. Sound nutrition fuels academic achievement. …  “State Food Assistance is a smart way to make sure no child goes hungry.”

You can see the letter here – it includes the names of Fain, three other Republicans and 21 Democrats. It is addressed to the budget leads, Republican Sen. Andy Hill of Redmond and Democratic Sen. Jim Hargrove of Hoquiam.

The three other Republicans signing on were Sen. Mike Hewitt of Walla Walla, Sen. Steve Litzow of Mercer Island and Sen. Bruce Dammeier of Puyallup. Democrats not signing included the top two minority caucus members on the Ways and Means Committee, Sen. Hargrove and Sharon Nelson of Vashon. The other Democrat not signing was first-year Sen. Mark Mullet of Issaquah.

“We are delighted that a majority of the Senate is willing to stand up for hungry kids and support restoring benefits so kids can be free of hunger and be ready to learn,’’ Gould said.

The letter is unusual in that interest groups usually round up support for spending and make it public after a budget is already on the table. But it isn’t unusual this year – in that others also are staking out areas of the budget that must get new investment:

  • Last week, House Republicans put out an “education first” budget. It proposed a net gain of $566 million for K-12 public schools above current levels. It also would cut $726 million in human services spending – some of it a reduction in state outlays because health reform is giving the state more money for Medicaid.

Senate Majority Leader Rodney Tom, one of two Democrats in the coalition, told a town hall group over the weekend that the Senate budget is due sometime next week – roughly March 28-30.

The Democrat-controlled House is expected to put out its budget plan soon after the Senate’s comes out. It is safe to assume the House majority is looking for new revenues to invest more into K-12 schools than the House Republicans are considering and to avoid some of the cuts that Republican Rep. Gary Alexander, author of the education-first plan, has hinted at.

Alexander wants to reduce welfare spending and repeal the fifth year of lifetime eligibility for those receiving Temporary Assistance to Needy Families grants. The House GOP proposal also has lots of fund transfers and assumes 2 percent savings across the board in state-government operations.

Gould said Rep. Eric Pettigrew, a Renton Democrat, is circulating a similar letter in the House.

The alliance believes the state needs more revenue and Gould said the social-services coalition wants to see unspecified tax exemptions closed to produce the additional funds.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Local Governments, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, Rich, Unemployed, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Washington State Smoking Law Is A Sham

Comment By Bob L.
03-15-2013

I DO NOT: SUPPORT, SPONSOR, OR PROMOTE any adds that appear in my Comments or Posts, these are added by WordPress.com

I don’t smoke, but I don’t think that there should be a double standard when it comes to the law, you ether allow smoking in ALL buildings or you ban smoking in ALL buildings, people have rights, not just some, but not according to this smoking ban, it Discriminate which I believe is illegal or is that the same as the smoking law, or is that a double standard too.

Red shows a Double Standard when you read the whole law, there is a lot more to this law but as you can see, there is a double standard all the way through it.

Washing State Smoking Law Is A Sham, you might say what do you mean it is a sham, Washington State and Hypocrites passed a law that you can not smoke within: a presumptively reasonable minimum distance, as set forth in RCW 70.160.075, of twenty-five feet from entrances, exits, windows that open, and ventilation intakes that serve an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited: now if you read the rest of the law you will see that there is a double standard, it depends on who you are, this law goes on and on and it will double talk it’s self all the way through, they just wanted it to sound or look good to the people, but are they really enforcing it like it says (NO):

RCW 70.160.020
As used in this chapter, the following terms have the meanings indicated unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) “Smoke” or “smoking” means the carrying or smoking of any kind of lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, or any other lighted smoking equipment.

(2) “Public place” means that portion of any building or vehicle used by and open to the public, regardless of whether the building or vehicle is owned in whole or in part by private persons or entities, the state of Washington, or other public entity, and regardless of whether a fee is charged for admission, and includes a presumptively reasonable minimum distance, as set forth in RCW 70.160.075, of twenty-five feet from entrances, exits, windows that open, and ventilation intakes that serve an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited. A public place does not include a private residence unless the private residence is used to provide licensed child care, foster care, adult care, or other similar social service care on the premises.

Public places include, but are not limited to: Schools, elevators, public conveyances or transportation facilities, museums, concert halls, theaters, auditoriums, exhibition halls, indoor sports arenas, hospitals, nursing homes, health care facilities or clinics, enclosed shopping centers, retail stores, retail service establishments, financial institutions, educational facilities, ticket areas, public hearing facilities, state legislative chambers and immediately adjacent hallways, public restrooms, libraries, restaurants, waiting areas, lobbies, bars, taverns, bowling alleys, skating rinks, casinos, reception areas, and no less than seventy-five percent of the sleeping quarters within a hotel or motel that are rented to guests. A public place does not include a private residence. This chapter is not intended to restrict smoking in private facilities which are occasionally open to the public except upon the occasions when the facility is open to the public.

(3) “Place of employment” means any area under the control of a public or private employer which employees are required to pass through during the course of employment, including, but not limited to: Entrances and exits to the places of employment, and including a presumptively reasonable minimum distance, as set forth in RCW 70.160.075, of twenty-five feet from entrances, exits, windows that open, and ventilation intakes that serve an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited; work areas; restrooms; conference and classrooms; break rooms and cafeterias; and other common areas. A private residence or home-based business, unless used to provide licensed child care, foster care, adult care, or other similar social service care on the premises, is not a place of employment.

Now you can see what they state on smoking ban, then you have apartments that use that double standard to say who can live in that Complex, so now you have people who are allowed to smoke there and break the smoking law, and then tell smokers moving in that they have to follow the Washington State smoking law or they will be evicted, but yet let others smoke in side their apartment, and if you live on the ground floor you can step out side your door or blow the smoke out the window, it is ok, so any one above has to keep their windows closed, so if you live on the ground floor you have the right to have fresh air, but not the people above them, and the same when you go in the hall, you have to breathe their smoke.

I look at it this way the people who don’t smoke are at the mercy of those who do and let that smoke filter out in to the hall so people who have a health problem have to put up with it, so how can you tell a person moving in that this is a non smoking facility when you have people there smoking, they do say that if you do smoke they have a place where they are to smoke if you are new to the facility rain or shine, but others do not have to use that place because they are Grandfathered in by the doubled standard law.

This State and others say the same thing, they are for protecting people with health problems to protecting Children to Seniors from having health problem, but with a law like this and any law that has a double standard is not protecting any one but a  hand-picked few.

Categories: America, Freedom, Health, Money, People, Personal Freedoms, Politics, Profiling | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Rise in youth smoking could cost state money

Comment By Bob L.
03-14-2013

Washington State looks like they are more worried about Cigarettes than they are about them smoking Marijuana, I bet they did not take that into account when they passed smoking Marijuana that they would get into that, but as you can see they are more worried about money than any thing else, but when it comes to spending it, WOW, they don’t know when to stop until it has gone to the point of asking taxpayers for more taxes so they can spend more.

They have even had an increase in minors Drinking since privatizing Alcohol, boy who did not see that coming. Pass more laws means more laws to break, and less Enforcement (so who is Dumb now).

Boy I can believe what the Democrats in DC made a comment about the American people, that they are dumb, so they can do any thing they want and no one will stop them because of how dumb they really are, this what elected servants think about the American people who elected them.

======================================================================

Rise in youth smoking could cost state money

By Jamie Lynn
Mar 13, 2013

TUMWATER, Wash. — Officials from the state health department, the liquor control board and the Thurston County sheriff’s office met on Wednesday to tackle the problem of children using tobacco.

State and local health officials are concerned, and not only for the health risks associated with smoking, but with the financial penalties at stake in the issue.

According to the state, the sale of tobacco to minors is at 10-year high. Currently, 13 percent of Washington State minors smoke cigarettes.

It’s a battle Secretary of Heath Mary Selecky continues to fight.

“They’re selling tobacco to kids who are underage age 18, and its against the law,” Selecky said.

Over the last few years, the state says between 12 and 15 percent of tobacco retailers haven’t been doing adequate identification checks.

Even though federal law states businesses must ask to see ID from anyone who appears younger than 27-years old, statistics show that isn’t happening.

Officials say the problem rests mainly with mom-and-pop stores across the state. Retailers are under pressure to sell, and Selecky said it could be a sign of the economic times.

“All the state funding for the kinds of programs we’ve had reaching out to youth or going in and doing retailer education has been reduced or is gone,” she said.

Obvious health dangers aside, if non compliance reaches 20 percent, the state could lose federal funding for drug and alcohol programs.

Because cigarettes are so expensive, health officials suggest parents pay attention to just how much money their children are spending.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Health, Money, Obama, People, Republicans, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Invasion of Privacy coming your way By the Obama Administration

Comment By Bob L.
03-13-2013

Now THIS IS Invasion of Privacy!!  Obama is not satifyed with the Banks doing their jobs, he wants every ones bank account under his control.

Look out, if you make a dollar more than you report you will be treated as a Terrorist, Criminal, or you will have the IRS at your door.

 They won’t stop there, they will find more ways to take it away from you. Lets start with checking into where these politicians are coming up with all these millions other than what they give them selves from taxpayers.

Look out if you win a Lotto Jackpot, a Law suit, or Inherit money, you will be classified as a Criminal or a Terrorist.

Obama Is not happy with the taxes he got, now he is going to turn others lose to get in to your bank accounts to see if you are truthful about your money that you work hard to make, and just think then he will then have IRS start going after you if you have more than you report.

From what I can see is that this is another way to get every dollar out of the Legal American people, or a way to blackmail you to not stand up for your rights.

I don’t know about you but I don’t like where this Country is headed, if you check history all dictators started out this way, to where they took control of every thing, like Banks, Companies, and control of money, and look what has happen since this Administration got control of most of America, Banks Closing, Companies having to anwser to the Government to stay in Business, and who is going to have a Job, or who is going to have money.

=====================================================================

Exclusive: U.S. plans to let spy agencies scour Americans’ finances

masthead-logo

By Emily Flitter and Stella Dawson and Mark Hosenball

03-13-2013

NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration is drawing up plans to give all U.S. spy agencies full access to a massive database that contains financial data on American citizens and others who bank in the country, according to a Treasury Department document seen by Reuters.

The proposed plan represents a major step by U.S. intelligence agencies to spot and track down terrorist networks and crime syndicates by bringing together financial databanks, criminal records and military intelligence. The plan, which legal experts say is permissible under U.S. law, is nonetheless likely to trigger intense criticism from privacy advocates.

Financial institutions that operate in the United States are required by law to file reports of “suspicious customer activity,” such as large money transfers or unusually structured bank accounts, to Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

The Federal Bureau of Investigation already has full access to the database. However, intelligence agencies, such as the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, currently have to make case-by-case requests for information to FinCEN.

The Treasury plan would give spy agencies the ability to analyze more raw financial data than they have ever had before, helping them look for patterns that could reveal attack plots or criminal schemes.

The planning document, dated March 4, shows that the proposal is still in its early stages of development, and it is not known when implementation might begin.

Financial institutions file more than 15 million “suspicious activity reports” every year, according to Treasury. Banks, for instance, are required to report all personal cash transactions exceeding $10,000, as well as suspected incidents of money laundering, loan fraud, computer hacking or counterfeiting.

“For these reports to be of value in detecting money laundering, they must be accessible to law enforcement, counter-terrorism agencies, financial regulators, and the intelligence community,” said the Treasury planning document.

A Treasury spokesperson said U.S. law permits FinCEN to share information with intelligence agencies to help detect and thwart threats to national security, provided they adhere to safeguards outlined in the Bank Secrecy Act. “Law enforcement and intelligence community members with access to this information are bound by these safeguards,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

Some privacy watchdogs expressed concern about the plan when Reuters outlined it to them.

A move like the FinCEN proposal “raises concerns as to whether people could find their information in a file as a potential terrorist suspect without having the appropriate predicate for that and find themselves potentially falsely accused,” said Sharon Bradford Franklin, senior counsel for the Rule of Law Program at the Constitution Project, a non-profit watchdog group.

Despite these concerns, legal experts emphasize that this sharing of data is permissible under U.S. law. Specifically, banks’ suspicious activity reporting requirements are dictated by a combination of the Bank Secrecy Act and the USA PATRIOT Act, which offer some privacy safeguards.

National security experts also maintain that a robust system for sharing criminal, financial and intelligence data among agencies will improve their ability to identify those who plan attacks on the United States.

“It’s a war on money, war on corruption, on politically exposed persons, anti-money laundering, organized crime,” said Amit Kumar, who advised the United Nations on Taliban sanctions and is a fellow at the Democratic think tank Center for National Policy.

SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY

The Treasury document outlines a proposal to link the FinCEN database with a computer network used by U.S. defense and law enforcement agencies to share classified information called the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System.

The plan calls for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence – set up after 9/11 to foster greater collaboration among intelligence agencies – to work with Treasury. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment.

More than 25,000 financial firms – including banks, securities dealers, casinos, and money and wire transfer agencies – routinely file “suspicious activity reports” to FinCEN. The requirements for filing are so strict that banks often over-report, so they cannot be accused of failing to disclose activity that later proves questionable. This over-reporting raises the possibility that the financial details of ordinary citizens could wind up in the hands of spy agencies.

Stephen Vladeck, a professor at American University’s Washington College of Law, said privacy advocates have already been pushing back against the increased data-sharing activities between government agencies that followed the September 11 attacks.

“One of the real pushes from the civil liberties community has been to move away from collection restrictions on the front end and put more limits on what the government can do once it has the information,” he said.

Michael German, senior policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said that U.S. officials had floated a similar scheme to pool such data a decade ago, but that funding for the plan was later withdrawn by Congress.

He said one of the problematic aspects of the plan is that there is “wiggle room” on how the information will be used. In the past, the National CounterTerrorism Center, which is supposed to ensure that critical threat information is shared among various agencies, was obliged to “promptly identify and purge any innocent U.S. person information.”

But the guidelines were subsequently loosened so that “not only can they keep the data for a number of years, but they can continue to use it,” German said.

Once spy agencies get such data, German said, “it’s in a black hole. Time and again, we have evidence, unfortunately well after the fact, that somebody’s civil rights have been violated, that the intelligence community simply ignores the rules.”

(Reporting by Emily Flitter in New York, Stella Dawson and Mark Hosenball in Washington; Editing by Tiffany Wu and Leslie Gevirtz)

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Money, Obama, People, Profiling, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Where is Education Today From Past Education

Comment: By Bob L.
03-10-2013            I can see discrimination or profiling coming

I DO NOT: SUPPORT, SPONSOR, OR PROMOTE any adds that appear in my Comments or Posts, these are added by WordPress.com

You have to read the whole article to see what I am saying, get mad at the end if you don’t agree what I am saying.

I can agree but I can also disagree with what Government is trying to do, what if you have a good Teacher in a school with good grade point averages, and the Principal does not like that Teacher because they do not do what the Principal wants, or they might want one of their good bodies there, then what do you have, than you have what is going on now, poor standard of Education, and then you have more strikes which is not good for the students THAT THESE TEACHERS took the oath to teach, not strike, but what they are teaching these kids, that it is alright to break the law to get what you want, is this what you want in Teachers.

From what I have seen in the last Twenty years is that some Teachers are more worried about them selves then they are for the Students that they are there to teach, just look at the signs that they were carrying, it did not say NO STUDENT LEFT BEHIND, it said NO TEACHER LEFT BEHIND, now how much education was done at that time while they were still getting paid, if they go on strike no pay or back pay from going on strike, give them ZERO income for no education, like the old saying NO TICKY NO WASHY period, you don’t work you don’t get paid.

Every time Public Servants go on strike or get a pay raise put another child and family out on the street with no plact to call home except maybe a shelter, or how about a car, maybe a box in an ally or under pass, but they don’t care as long as they get their pay raises at the same time taxes go up to pay for all this, other words GREED.

Teachers go on strike in violation of the law, they block the side walks, they are a  traffic distraction by having so many on the picket line, and the courts do nothing about it, but yet when the private sector goes on strike they are told that they can not have more than three striker at one location, but not the teachers, the courts do nothing but threaten them, is this what education is all about.

How come schools don’t start teaching a trade when these kids are in high school, then maybe you would not have such a drop out rate, and this would let them have a good idea what they want to do, go to a trade school, a Junior college, or a full term College, but the way Education is to-day, there is too much testing and very little Teaching, in 1960′s teachers started with more home work and less in school teaching.

Let these Teachers teach what they went to school for, and I don’t think the good teachers went to College to be GREEDY and hurt the kids more then they now have.

Back then they help the good students and didn’t worry about the ones that had a hard time under standing math and english, that was my problem, but it is not about me it is about our children today, we can not go back, but we can go forward and make sure that our Children don’t get put in that position and have a better education.

Look where some of our earler Million airs came from with only an Eight grade education and were smarter then College graduates to day, and don’t say not to knock college education, look at what is happening today, Government Agencies are a good example of a college education, they can only see a blank check and can not see what that blank check has done to this Country, it has more people unemployed, home less, and and going Bankrupt, so now you say don’t knock College Education that only produces greed.

We do have some good Teachers that want to teach, and we have some who just want more money and not teach,  but their hands are tied by the powers above them who won’t let them teach what should be taught, they want things that most students don’t need or want, students need a skill, how about starting law, electronics, automotive, and medical in high school if that is what they want, but if you don’t give them a chance to find out what they want they will never know if that is what they want.

The problem today with education is that it is run by the Government who in turn won’t let the teachers concentrate on Reading Writing and Arithmetic which is used in a lot of jobs, but not all jobs need heavy reading writing and arithmetic, but still is need, get the politicians out of it and let the TEACHERS teach, that is what they went to school for, just like every one else with a trade, all you need is the basics and a skill to know what they want to do.

========================================================================

Peacemaker in Tacoma teachers strike deal could be doomed

Melissa Santos; Staff writer
Published: March 9, 2013

Barely 18 months after teachers in Tacoma went on strike over their district’s proposal to give principals more authority over teacher placement, the Legislature is poised to derail the plan that helped make peace between the union and school system.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Governor, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Profiling, Republicans, Unemployed, Unions, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Democrats Can Not wait to get their Hands on more tax Increases

Comment By Bob L.
03-09-2013

I DO NOT: SUPPORT, PROMOTE , OR  SPONSOR any adds that appear in my Comments or Posts, these are added by WordPress.com.

Democrats just can’t wait to get their hands on more tax increases, Washington State is no exception from Washington DC, they talk about how they want to protect the American people from those dirty Republicans who want to take every thing away, but from what I can see is it is the tax and spend Democrats who you have to look out for.

442780-Royalty-Free-RF-Clip-Art-Illustration-Of-A-Cartoon-Gas-Pump-Holding-Up-A-CustomerWhen washington Courts told Washington residents that their vote does not count, Democrats can not wait to raise their GAS TAX to FIFTY ($.50) CENTS a GALLON, to help Seattle and King County build another Stadium, they say it is for highway improvements, but any one who has lived here for any time, know that a lot of that money has gone to more than what they say, no matter how much it will hurt the state and the unemployed to find work, these Democrats do not care what will happen, just as long as they get what they want, more money to WASTE.

=====================================================================

State Democrats may have to listen to GOP transportation ideas

JORDAN SCHRADER; Staff writer
Published: March 9, 2013

Hoping to persuade Republicans to support a major gas tax increase, Democrats may have to take seriously some GOP proposals about how state money is spent on road projects.

Indeed, Democrats say they are interested in some of what Republicans announced Thursday as their top priorities for cutting transportation costs.

“What I would like to see is … You take the reforms, then you come and help us with the funding. I think it’s a partnership,” said House Transportation Chairwoman Judy Clibborn, the Mercer Island Democrat who has proposed a package including a 10-cent gas tax increase to fund projects such as extending state Route 167. “If they want to start with efficiencies, that’s fine.”

Minority House Republicans have been cool to House Democrats’ nearly $10 billion tax package, and they are making no public promises to warm up if they get what they want.

The Republicans’ point man on transportation, Kalama Rep. Ed Orcutt, said the Legislature needs to address high costs and recent Department of Transportation errors — and Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee needs to sign those changes into law — before Republicans consider asking taxpayers for more money.

“Let’s find out what our current dollars can do, figure out what is truly needed when we fix the cost issue, and then we can figure out what we can do as far as any additional revenue,” Orcutt said.

Republicans are on the wrong side of a 55-43 split in the House, and a majority there can vote to raise taxes after the state Supreme Court struck down voter-imposed requirements for two-thirds supermajorities. But Republicans are ascendant in the Senate, where Majority Leader Rodney Tom, a Medina Democrat who caucuses with the GOP, has voiced support for a higher gas tax but said he would not allow tax increases without two-thirds support.

Orcutt cited six changes seen as crucial, including four specific to transportation:

n An exemption for state transportation projects from paying sales tax. House Bill 1985 would apply only to future projects.

n  Replacing 30-year bonds with 15-year bonds so bonded gas tax money isn’t tied up paying off projects long after they are finished. House Bill 1989 would make that change to borrowing.

n Limiting DOT’s liability in lawsuits. House Bill 1984 seeks to limit payouts to the level of the department’s fault. DOT paid out $33 million in fiscal 2011.

n Require DOT to report on engineering errors costing more than $500,000 and explain why employees were not fired after mistakes of more than $1 million. House Bill 1986 could have affected recent mistakes on pontoons built for a new state Route 520 floating bridge and on a misplaced ramp on the Nalley Valley Viaduct.

“Take the pontoon fiasco. I can’t think of a corporation or business, however small or large, that somebody wouldn’t have to resign because they cost the shareholders or owners that kind of money,” said Rep. Steve O’Ban, a Tacoma Republican who introduced the reporting measure.

Inslee has said officials have zeroed in on a solution for cracking in the pontoons.

TARGETING PERMITS

Two other measures take on environmental regulations.

House Bill 1236 would require state environmental agencies to issue permits within 90 days — on a wide array of projects, public or private, not just transportation.

Permitting agencies would have to make quick evaluations of the potential for damage or pollution by projects, potentially short-circuiting legal challenges by environmental groups and benefiting contractors and other businesses.

Clibborn has signed onto a different permitting bill sponsored by Republican Rep. Hans Zeiger of Puyallup. House Bill 1978 would hone in on transportation permitting, creating a new process for large transportation projects.

The measures could also get some sympathy from supporters of unions, whose members gave House GOP Leader Richard DeBolt a smattering of applause at a Thursday forum where he talked about onerous regulations and a backlog of environmental permits.

“I think there’s sort of a bipartisan sense around: Can we make a quicker and (more transparent) permitting process,” said Rep. Mike Sells, a Democrat and Snohomish County labor leader.

But House Majority Leader Pat Sullivan of Covington also received applause at the Washington State Labor Council forum for defending the sprawl-fighting Growth Management Act. And Clibborn argued efforts to gut the act are a distraction from true cost drivers.

Orcutt said the sprawl rules are preventing communities from building out developments served by already built roads. House Bill 1619, the last part of the package he promoted, would suspend the act for counties where unemployment is at more than 7 percent — currently, nearly the whole state.

Orcutt also calls for ending a build-in-Washington requirement for state ferries, though he doesn’t rank it among Republicans’ top priorities.

A January report by the state Auditor’s Office found the state is spending more on ferries than other purchasers, driven partly by the build-in-Washington rule.

In her speech to labor, Clibborn focused in on that area of disagreement. She said she has seen a “vibrant shipbuilding industry grow” in part because of ferry work.

Clibborn said she would put forward reform bills of her own next week.

Jordan Schrader: 360-786-1826
blog.thenewstribune.com/politics
jordan.schrader@thenewstribune.com
@Jordan_Schrader

Categories: America, Democrats, Governor, Greed, Jobs, Money, People, Politics, Taxes, Unemployed | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Cut Two Transit Systems, One is All You Need, One OR the Other, Not Both

Comment By Bob L.
03-06-2013

th 2th 4
Look at the colors of Two different Transit
Companies, looks like one Company to me.

I don’t know about any one else in Washington State, but Here in Pierce County we are paying for Pierce Transit, and Sound Transit, I feel ONE Transit is all you need, Taxes and subsidies of all this is eventually going to have an adverse effect on the State when they really need the help. And now they want a Transit tax on top of what is being paid now in taxes for them to operate, I say enough is enough, but you know these YUPPIES will want more.

At the rate these Government Agencies are going they will have Three Forth 3/4 of the people living in a cardboard box, and when this happens I hope the people who created the problem are happy that they put Seniors, disabled, and children out in the cold to die.

When is it going to stop, or is it going to go on untill only Public Employees, and big companies have a roof over their heads and no one else, the problem is that this Country has gotten so greedy that they don’t care how they hurt others, just as long as they keep getting bigger and bigger pay packages and higher taxes, while the rest of the people who don’t get that type of pay, they end up paying for the extravagant life styles of GREEDY YUPPIES.

Even unions don’t get a decent wage for all union workers, a good example, my wife worked for a grocery store, paid union dues and only got Twenty Hours a week, the only benefits she got was a job, so much for a union job, not all unions work for you, they only work for them selves and Companies.

===================================================

Pierce Transit request for tax district may be doomed

JORDAN SCHRADER; Staff writer
Published March 6, 2013

Pierce Transit’s request to be allowed to draw a special district where it could restore some bus service if voters agree to pay a higher sales tax has run into a wall in the state Senate.

Senate Transportation Committee Co-chairman Curtis King is balking at the proposal to let the agency draw a special district where it could stave off some cuts to bus service if voters agree to pay a higher sales tax.

The Yakima Republican said he told the bill’s supporters: “As far as the Senate is concerned, that bill is dead.”

Prospects are not looking good either for measures that would let King County’s Metro Transit, Snohomish County’s Community Transit and cities across the state raise new transportation taxes. King says his problem with the Pierce Transit measure is really a more general problem with the local-option transportation taxes: They could leave voters too fatigued to approve a big statewide transportation-tax package.

Not that King is pushing for such a statewide tax increase right now. “I just don’t think the people of the state are ready to give us more of their money,” he said. Like other Republicans, he wants changes to how transportation money is spent before taxes are raised. But he does agree the state’s transportation grid has major funding needs and worries voters will be less likely to support new taxes to pay for those statewide if they have just seen local taxes go up.

As co-chairman, King can essentially veto any legislation from passing through his committee.

But the Pierce Transit measure could always be revived as part of last-minute negotiations over a transportation tax package — if lawmakers were to go ahead with one.

Tacoma Democrats Sen. Jeannie Darneille and Jake Fey were the chief backers of the Pierce Transit measure. Darneille said Tacoma residents who twice voted for an extra three-tenths of a cent in Pierce Transit sales tax, only to see the tax twice go down to defeat in overall voting, should be allowed to restore some of their service.

Darneille said worries about cherry-picking voters helped doom the bill. But she said bringing it forward helped lawmakers outside Pierce County recognize the “catastrophic” cuts the transit agency has faced.

“It was an option worth floating,” she said.

Pierce Transit is slated to cut service by another 28 percent this fall starting in September.

Jordan Schrader: 360-786-1826
jordan.schrader@thenewstribune.com
blog.thenewstribune.com/politics
@Jordan_Schrader

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Unions, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Democrats: Washington State Voters Go To Hell

Comment:   For the People
03-01-2013

Take a look at who the leader of this are, the politicians who say they are for the people, to protect them from run away Government by the Republicans, DEMOCRATS, yes Democrats proved that behind closed doors when they gave the Americans the biggest tax increase with Obamacare.

Here we go again, Government Agencies telling Americans to go to HELL, your votes don’t count any more, even if they did before, but now it really shows how elected officials think of the voting public, vote me in and I will protect your rights.

I can remember when people voted down Daylight Saving s Time, voted for Gambling, and there the Government said go to hell and that was the start of a Dictator Government, and today it has gotten to the point that, I will leave it there, you finish the story because the courts will not protect legal Americans for a right to a free America.

Today there are to many YUPPIES that want to control every thing, so to help them you have Environmentalist, Special Interest Groups, to many to name, and minorities, that includes just a hand full of people who have more control than the majority.

Today you can have a vote and it can go this way 50 to 300, and the 50 will win, so what do you think, do we recall every one who lies to get into office and send them to jail for treason against the state, REMEMBER the people are the State and Government, that also means local Governments as well, remember Washington State, the Government is thinking about turning over to the Local Governments the Power to Raise Taxes with out the vote of the people.

How about this, they say they are not going to go crazy on taxes, but yet they want to put Another tax on Gas to Make It, you might just as well say $.50 cents a gallon State plus Local and Federal to buy gas in Washington State, so it can all go to Seattle and King County, but they are not going to go crazy with taxes, look out U.S. you are next.

Bend Over Every One, you are going to get it with out grease or any lubricant because of the Environment, grease pollutes.

=======================================================

Education supporters celebrate WA court ruling

by KING 5 News
Posted on February 28, 2013

Getting two-thirds of lawmakers to agree on raising taxes has been considered next to impossible.

Now that the Washington Supreme Court struck down the vote requirement, two budget issues, transportation and education, may have another option for funding.

However, lawmakers are mindful that 44 of the state’s 49 legislative districts passed the two-thirds requirement, so don’t expect an immediate rush to raise taxes.

By Associated Press
Posted on February 28, 2013
Updated at 5:25 PM

SEATTLE  — The Washington Supreme Court has struck down a requirement for a two-thirds majority vote in the Legislature to pass a tax increase.

A divided high court ruled 6-3 Thursday that an initiative requiring a two-thirds vote was in conflict with the state Constitution. And that lawmakers and the people of Washington would need to pass a constitutional amendment to change from a simple majority to a supermajority.

A coalition of lawmakers and education groups sued the state over the issue, and a King County judge decided last spring that the state constitution requires only a simple majority to pass tax proposals. The Supreme Court agreed to expedite its consideration.

Read the decision

“This ruling is a huge win for kids and schools,” said Chris Korsmo, CEO of the League of Education Voters, one of the lead plaintiffs. “Washington schools need to be fully funded in order to ensure that all kids reach their potential. This ruling, combined with the recent McCleary decision, will help ensure that our kids have all the resources they need to get an excellent education.”

Most people agree the state needs about $4 billion to fulfill its constitutional promise to fully pay for basic education by 2018.

Gov. Jay Inslee said the court had done the right thing.

“The supermajority requirement gave a legislative majority the power to squelch ideas even when those ideas had majority support. That is inconsistent with our fundamental form of representative democracy,” Inslee said in a statement.

State Sen. Pam Roach, R-Auburn, said the court had opened the floodgates of taxation with its ruling. The chairwoman of the Senate Governmental Operations Committee has already proposed a constitutional amendment to make the two-thirds majority permanent.

“This is a seminal point in our history,” she said, noting that the people in every county have already shown their support for a two-thirds tax rule.

The two-thirds majority rule has been approved in a series of initiatives pushed by activist Tim Eyman. Voters most recently approved the supermajority rule last November.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Susan Owens, states that under a commonsense understanding, any bill receiving a simple majority vote will become law. No language in the provision qualifies that requirement by stating a bill needs “at least a majority vote.”

They wrote that without the simple majority rule in the Constitution, the people or the Legislature could require particular bills to receive 90 percent approval rather than just a two-thirds approval, thus essentially ensuring that those types of bills would never pass.

“Such a result is antithetical to the notion of a functioning government and should be rejected as such,” the justices wrote.

Justice Charles Johnson, writes in a dissent, that “In its eagerness to embroil itself in the political arena, the majority abandons any semblance of judicial restraint to declare the process of legislative enactment constitutionally infirm.”

Johnson wrote that voters have repeatedly voted for the supermajority provision, and that the court has repeatedly been asked to weigh in in past years and had previously “rejected the invitation to engage in this political dispute, exercising the wisdom, restraint, and temperance not to step outside the court’s constitutional authority.”

“Evidently something has changed, though the majority does not tell us what, to cause it to abandon these limiting principles and chart a new course for the court to more actively engage in the political process,” he wrote. “This change is both unwise and unprecedented.”

Categories: America, Democrats, Freedom, Governor, Greed, Home Less, Jobs, Money, People, Politics, Taxes, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Misdiagnoses in doctor’s office can do harm

Comment By Bob L.
02-27-2013

If you watch TV they want you to believe that you have heart burn when you feel like your chest feels like it is burning, want I would like to know is are these people qualified to practice medicine and telling people that that burning feeling is just heart burn, well I thought that for about two years, and that is what doctors said, well I almost died, but my wife put me in the hospital when I gor back home from a run from Texas.

Guess what they did not want to let me out of the Hospital because it was not heart burn, it was blocked arteries and I almost died and could have kill other while out there driving truck, just because I believed the Actors that were say ing all it is just heart burn while they making big money acting like doctors or just a good friend so they can make money.

So the big Question IS, how can they be allowed to push drugs of all kinds and not be qualified Medical Doctors to do so??  Now just think how many accidents can be caused by Misdiagnoses from actors let alone some doctors.

Can you imagine how many people think that they have heart burn when in fact it is a heart problem, and that put many people in harm’s way while they are driving on our highways, just because an actor tells them it is nothing but heart burn, get that so-called heart burn checked out, it could mean your life and your families.

========================================================

Reuters

Misdiagnoses in doctor’s office can do harm: study

By Genevra Pittman, Reuters
Feb. 25, 2013

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Missed or wrong diagnoses in primary care may put thousands of patients at risk of complications each year, a new study suggests.

Although mistakes during surgery and in medication prescribing have been at the center of patient safety efforts, researchers said less attention has been paid to missed diagnoses in the doctor’s office.

Those errors may lead to more patient injuries and deaths than other mistakes, according to Dr. David Newman-Toker from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, who co-wrote a commentary on the new study.

“We have every reason to believe that diagnostic errors are a major, major public health problem,” Newman-Toker told Reuters Health.

“You’re really talking about at least 150,000 people per year, deaths or disabilities that are resulting from this problem.”

For the new study, researchers used electronic health records to track 190 diagnostic errors made during primary care visits at one of two healthcare facilities. In each of those cases, the misdiagnosed patient was hospitalized or turned up back at the office or emergency room within two weeks.

The study team found the type of missed diagnosis varied widely. Pneumonia, heart failure, kidney failure and cancer each accounted for between five and seven percent of conditions doctors initially diagnosed as something else.

Most diagnostic errors could have caused moderate or severe harm to the patient, the researchers determined. Of the 190 patients with diagnostic errors, 36 had serious, permanent damage and 27 died, according to findings published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine.

One of the difficulties in making an accurate diagnosis is certain common symptoms – such as stomach ache or shortness of breath – could be signs of a range of illnesses, both serious and not, researchers said.

“If you look at the types of chief complaints that these things occur with, they’re fairly common chief complaints,” said Dr. Hardeep Singh, who led the new study at the Houston VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence.

“If somebody would come in with mild shortness of breath and a little bit of cough, people would think you might have bronchitis, you might have phlegm… and lo and behold they would come back two days later with heart failure,” he told Reuters Health.

Most of the missed diagnoses were traced back to the office visit and the doctor not getting an accurate patient history, doing a full exam or ordering the correct tests, Singh’s team found.

Cutting down on those errors may require changes in doctor training, for example. One thing patients can do, the researchers agreed, is come to the office prepared to give their doctor all of the relevant information about the nature and timing of their symptoms.

“I do think it’s important for a patient to question or observe the doctor,” Newman-Toker said. “Ask pointed questions: ‘What else could this be? What things are you most concerned about?’”

In addition, he told Reuters Health, patients should “not just assume that once the diagnosis has happened the first time, that everything is said and done and that it’s all over. You just can’t have blind obedience to the doctor’s diagnosis.”

For example, Newman-Toker said, if people develop new symptoms or their symptoms worsen, they shouldn’t assume everything is fine because their doctor initially diagnosed something not serious.

Patients should understand there is some uncertainly involved in a diagnosis, Singh said, especially because symptoms and conditions can change over time.

“We need to get patients more engaged in the conversation with the providers,” he said. “I think the main message is: how do we effectively (make diagnoses) together?”

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/MbBLbb JAMA Internal Medicine, online February 25, 2013.

Categories: America, Education, Health, Politics, SAFETY, White House | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Wine and Cheese With Out Crackers, But Every Thing Else Free

Comment By Bob L.
02-20-2013

Should Barack Obama get a raise?

SAY WHAT,

734374_335216063249386_542065649_nFor what they get above and beyond, they can stick it in their ear, I think every one else should get what they get, but to say that without a cost of living they are falling behind, well how about most of American workers who don’t get a cost of living, where do they stand, going backwards as usual to the rest of the GREEDY who get automatic pay raises and cost of living every year, SO don’t come crying and say that they need  a pay raise, for with what they get, FOR and AFTER Office, NO WAY.

How about the people who DO NOT  get a pay raise or cost of living every year, and they still have to pay for the same thing as every one else does, so don’t come crying and saying they need more, I think it should be UP TO THE PEOPLE to VOTE on whether they get more compensation or not, and not leave it up to them to do it for them selves, they control what the private sector gets to a point, why not the other way around.

When did it become a policy to go in for the money and not for the country???

Down with all parties affiliations after they are Elected, NO Democrats, Republicans, or any other Organizations, JUST ONE, THE UNITED STATES, I won’t party because that is all they would do, just like now.

=====================================================================

Should Barack Obama or the next president get a raise?

By Scott Bomboy | National Constitution Center
02-19-2013
President Barack Obama’s salary pales in comparison to the average CEO. But does the president really need a raise? The historical data says “yes,” but the potential big payoff for newer presidents says “probably not.”

In 2011, the average Fortune 500 company leader made $12 million a year. President Obama has a $400,000 annual salary, gets a $50,000 expense account, and a really cool house to live in. But he has to buy his own food in some cases.

The debate over presidential pay dates back to the Prohibition era, when people were shocked in 1930 when baseball star Babe Ruth was given a salary that paid more than President Herbert Hoover’s.

Ruth legendary response was, “So what? I had a better year than he did.”

President Obama’s compensation is above average compared with other world leaders, including the leaders of China, Russia, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and Germany. Many are not far behind, though, with compensation in the US$200,000 – $300,000 range. And a handful are paid much more; the leader of Singapore gets about US$1.7 million a year.

The U.S. Constitution outlines how the president can get a raise and lets Congress decide on the timing through legislation.

Article II, Section 1 says that “The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”

President Washington received a salary of $25,000 in 1789, which was a lot of money at the time. It’s difficult to estimate the current value; projections range from $300,000 to $4 million in current dollars (depending on the economic barometer). But Washington also had to cover most of his own expenses. Luckily, the father of our country was a wealthy landowner.

Since the time of President Washington, there have been five presidential pay raises, which were effective in the next presidential term after Congress passed them. For example, in January 1969, the outgoing president was Lyndon Johnson; the pay raise took effect when Richard Nixon became president.

Pay hikes came in 1873 ($50,000), 1909 ($75,000), 1949 ($100,000), 1969 ($200,000), and 2001 ($400,000).

The chief benefactors of those pay raises were the first presidents to receive them, since they weren’t as susceptible to inflation. So in current 2012 dollars, Ulysses S. Grant received $945,000 in 1873; William Howard Taft got a hefty $1.9 million in 1909; Harry S. Truman received $950,000 in 1949; and Richard Nixon got $1.2 million in 1969. President George W. Bush’s pay was not considerably higher due to inflation over the past decade. But he did see his pay double compared with President Bill Clinton’s salary in 2000.

Basically, because there is no cost-of-living adjustment, the presidents make less each year they are in office.

Contemporary presidents do have a big advantage over their predecessors when it comes to making money after they leave office, and that is where they’re more competitive with CEOs.

Until 1958, presidents didn’t receive a pension after leaving office. Today, a president receives an annual pension equal to the current salary of a Cabinet secretary (about $200,000 per year) when leaving the White House.

In a 2008 report, the Congressional Research Service said that the three former presidents at the time (Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Clinton) were receiving between $518,000 and $1.1 million a year in benefits from taxpayers, including pensions, office space, transportation, and other expenses.

Presidents George W. Bush and Clinton also signed lucrative book contracts after leaving office.

Clinton, in particular, has made out well financially. He told CNN in 2010, “”I’ve never had any money until I got out of the White House. But I’ve done reasonably well since then.”

Clinton made $16 million by giving speeches soon after he left office in 2001. By 2010, the website 24/7 Wall Street estimated that Clinton’s net worth was $55 million, and he had made $125 million before taxes.

On the 2012 campaign trail, candidate Mitt Romney floated the idea of a compensation plan that would make the president and other politicians more like CEOs, using incentives.

“I wish we had that happen throughout government–where people recognized they are not going to get rewarded in substantial ways unless they are able to achieve the objectives that they were elected to carry out,” he said.

However, that could backfire on a president. For example, the CEO of Walmart, Mike Duke, makes about $17 million in total annual compensation. Walmart also had a $16 billion profit in 2011.

The federal government annual deficit for the same year was $1.3 trillion.

Scott Bomboy is the editor-in-chief of the National Constitution Center.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Profiling, Republicans, Rich, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Stupidity Comes From Education, Or Is The Other Way Around

Comment By Bob L.
02-16-2013

Has This country gotten so greedy that they will sell their own people734374_335216063249386_542065649_n down the river to make another Million, Now just where do they think they are going to get people to buy any thing if no ones got a job to buy their products, Stock Market Crash, and who will you blame, Government, Corporations, Rich, and the People in that order, because of GREED.

Eventually there won’t even be a Government job to be had if this Country keeps going on this path, not even an election for politicians to make laws, it will be run by Corporations and computers, well even the rich will no longer have a job to make money off the poor, because the poor will be Dead, No Job, No Money, No Food, well you know the rest, OH that is right, you won’t know, because you will be dead.

Web-ethics28rb1_1378984cl-3And just think you will never know if your children ever made it, oh there again, OH I for got, your children will die with you, sad but true, well I hope all of you greedy people get what you want, computers to do your work, because you are all trying to catch up with the rest of the greedy people, and you don’t care what you are doing to your Children and theirs future.

And just think the Government wonder why people are going berserk with guns and any thing they can to get money to feed their families, Oh my GOD is that it, yes people are coming unwound, mentally and Physically, or what you call NUTS.

========================================================

Jobs With a Terrible Outlook

  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
  • Vanishing Jobs
1 of 8 photos
Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Health, Home Less, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, Rich, SAFETY, Unemployed, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan will Stop,People already in the plan will not lose coverage.

Comment By        405987_392699840825064_515728870_n

========================================================================

Associated Press

Obama admin winds down plan for ‘uninsurables’

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press
Feb. 16, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — Citing financial concerns, the Obama administration has begun quietly winding down one of the earliest programs created by the president’s health care overhaul, a plan that helps people with medical problems who can’t get private insurance.

In an afternoon teleconference with state counterparts, administration officials said Friday the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan will stop taking new applications. People already in the plan will not lose coverage.

Designed as a stopgap solution until the law’s full consumer protections are in effect next year, PCIP has served more than 135,000 people, a lifeline for patients with serious medical problems such as cancer and heart failure. But Congress allocated a limited amount of money, and the administration’s technical experts want to make sure it doesn’t run out.

Health and Human Services Department spokeswoman Erin Shields Britt said PCIP has “provided needed security to some of our nation’s sickest people.”

The plan covers people who have had problems getting private insurance because of a medical condition and have been uninsured for at least six months. Premiums are keyed to average rates charged in each state, which means they’re not necessarily cheap, often amounting to several hundred dollars a month for middle-aged individuals.

“We’re glad this program was here and able to help,” said Amie Goldman, who oversees the program in Wisconsin. “I’m certainly disappointed we won’t be able to serve everyone who has a need for this coverage.”

Starting next January 1, insurance companies will no longer be able to turn anyone away because of poor health. At the same time, the federal government will begin subsidizing coverage for millions of individuals who have no access to employer plans. That means many of the people currently in the PCIP program may end up with lower premiums once the government’s financial help is factored in.

The enrollment suspension will take effect immediately in 23 states where the federal government administers the program, Goldman said. Residents of states that run their own programs may have longer. Wisconsin residents, for example, have until March 2 to apply.

Enrollment around the country has been lower than expected, partly because some people could not afford the premiums. But individual cases have turned out to be costlier than originally projected.

In documents provided to the states, the administration said the program has spent about $2.4 billion in taxpayer money on medical claims and nearly $180 million on administrative costs, as of Dec. 31. Congress allocated $5 billion to the plan.

“From the beginning (the administration) has been committed to monitoring PCIP enrollment and spending closely and making necessary adjustments in the program to ensure responsible management of the $5 billion provided by Congress,” PCIP director Richard Popper wrote in a memo. “To this end, we are implementing a nationwide suspension of enrollment.”

The sole exception: program beneficiaries who move to another state will still be able to get coverage in their new home.

___

Associated Press writer Ann Sanner in Ohio contributed to this report.

Categories: America, Democrats, Health, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Profiling, Republicans, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

And You Voted To Keep ObamaCare As It Is

Comment By Bob L.
02-16-2013

All can say is, it is going to get worse before it gets better, and you just could not let Obamacare get put down.

=======================================================================

Special insurance program for the sick suspends enrollment

Reuters

Reporting by David Morgan; Editing by Tim Dobbyn
Feb. 15, 2013

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration on Friday said it would stop enrolling new beneficiaries in a special $5 billion insurance program for people with pre-existing medical conditions, because of rising costs and limited funding.

The news comes a day after a top U.S. healthcare official told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that the administration is grappling with financial difficulties but determined to keep the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) operating in 23 states and the District of Columbia through 2013.

PCIP was established in 2010 under President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law to provide coverage for sick people unable to find it in the private insurance market. The program is designed as a bridge to January 1, 2014, when legal restrictions barring discrimination over medical conditions come into force.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice on Friday saying it would suspend new enrollments beginning on Saturday to “help ensure that funds are available through 2013 to continuously cover people currently enrolled in PCIP.”

“The program has a limited amount of funding from Congress,” the notice added.

About 100,000 current PCIP beneficiaries are not affected by the change, which follows more than two years of escalating enrollments and outlays. Twenty-seven state-run PCIPs will suspend new enrollments after March 2, HHS said.

The news underscores the financial costs involved in covering people with pre-existing conditions, including many with costly chronic diseases, as the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry prepares for sweeping reforms that analysts say could bring higher health insurance costs.

Gary Cohen, the HHS official responsible for overseeing implementation of Obama’s healthcare reforms, including PCIP, told the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday that the administration had begun to alter program benefits while grappling with funding restrictions.

“Running out of money before the end of the year is something we’re trying to avoid,” he said.

Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allocated $5 billion to the program for claims and administrative expenses that exceed premiums collected from enrollees.

An annual report, released on January 31 by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), showed that monthly expenditures peaked last June at nearly $180 million and have since fallen back a level closer to $150 million.

The average cost for an enrollee in 2012 was $32,108 per enrollee and varied widely from state to state, from a low of $4,276 to a high of $171,909, according to CMS, which is an agency within HHS.

Costs also varied widely between enrollees, with 4.4 percent of PCIP beneficiaries accounting for more than half of claims paid in 2012.

Categories: America, Democrats, Health, Money, Obama, People, Personal Freedoms, Politics, Profiling, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Is This What You Wanted

Comment By Bob L.
02-11-2013

(Foot note to all who follow my web page, I am going to start Live Video feed tonight About 6 MP on (  http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bob-s-comments-of-news-today )  Hope to see you there.

Is this what you were promised when you voted, Taxes on Health Insurance per head, more taxes come on what you make and buy, well lets put it this way any thing you do from now on is going to have a tax in it, just wait, they will find a way to put a tax on any one who toots to much, and call it a Global Warming tax the same way they want to tax farmers on farm animals.

If they do come up with a tax on people who toot to much, I hope you have a good job because the foot print will be expensive, see the only way they can get away with it is just outright tax you on a percentage per day, so get all the toots out you can now because you might not get another chance, you have been warned.

==========================================================================

How Obama is wielding executive power in 2nd term

By CALVIN WOODWARD and RICHARD LARDNER | Associated Press
02-11-2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — This is what “Forward” looks like. Fast forward, even.

President Barack Obama’s campaign slogan is springing to life in a surge of executive directives and agency rule-making that touch many of the affairs of government. They are shaping the cost and quality of health plans, the contents of the school cafeteria, the front lines of future combat, the price of coal. They are the leading edge of Obama’s ambition to take on climate change in ways that may be unachievable in legislation.

Altogether, it’s a kinetic switch from what could have been the watchword of the Obama administration in the closing, politically hypersensitive months of his first term: pause.

Whatever the merits of any particular commandment from the president or his agencies, the perception of a government expanding its reach and hitting business with job-killing mandates was sure to set off fireworks before November.

Since Obama’s re-election, regulations giving force and detail to his health care law have gushed out by the hundreds of pages. To some extent this was inevitable: The law is far-reaching and its most consequential deadlines are fast approaching.

The rules are much more than fine print, however, and they would have thickened the storm over the health care overhaul if placed on the radar in last year’s presidential campaign. That, after all, was the season when some Republicans put the over-the-top label “death panel” on a board that could force cuts to service providers if Medicare spending ballooned.

The new health law rules provide leeway for insurers to charge smokers thousands of dollars more for coverage. They impose a $63 per-head fee on insurance plans — a charge that probably will be passed on to policyholders — to cushion the cost of covering people with medical problems. There’s a new fee for insurance companies for participating in markets that start signing customers in the fall.

In short, sticker shock.

It’s clear from the varied inventory of previously bottled-up directives that Obama cares about more than “Obamacare.”

“I’m hearing we’re going to see a lot of things moving now,” Hilda Solis told employees in her last day as labor secretary. At the Labor Department, this could include regulations requiring that the nation’s 1.8 million in-home care workers receive minimum-wage and overtime pay.

Tougher limits on soot from smokestacks, diesel trucks and other sources were announced just over a month after the Nov. 6 election. These were foreseen: The administration had tried to stall until the campaign ended but released the proposed rules in June when a judge ordered more haste.

Regulations give teeth and specificity to laws are essential to their functioning even as they create bureaucratic bloat. Congress-skirting executive orders and similar presidential directives are less numerous and generally have less reach than laws. But every president uses them and often tests how far they can go, especially in times of war and other crises.

President Harry Truman signed an executive order in 1952 directing the Commerce Department to take over the steel industry to ensure U.S. troops fighting in Korea were kept supplied with weapons and ammunition. The Supreme Court struck it down.

Other significant actions have stood.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an order in February 1942 to relocate more than 110,000 Japanese-Americans living on the West Coast to internment camps after Japan’s attack on the Pearl Harbor naval base. Decades later, Congress passed legislation apologizing and providing $20,000 to each person who was interned.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush approved a series of executive orders that created an office of homeland security, froze the assets in U.S. banks linked to al-Qaida and other terrorist groups, and authorized the military services to call reserve forces to active duty for as long as two years.

Bush’s most contentious move came in the form of a military order approving the use of the military tribunals to put accused terrorists on trial faster and in greater secrecy than a regular criminal court.

Obama also has wielded considerable power in secret, upsetting the more liberal wing of his own party. He has carried forward Bush’s key anti-terrorism policies and expanded the use of unmanned drone strikes against terrorist targets in Pakistan and Yemen.

When a promised immigration overhaul failed in legislation, Obama went part way there simply by ordering that immigrants brought illegally to the United States as children be exempted from deportation and granted work permits if they apply. So, too, the ban on gays serving openly in the military was repealed before the election, followed now by the order lifting the ban on women serving in combat.

Those measures did not prove especially contentious. Indeed, the step on immigration is thought to have helped Obama in the election. It may be a different story as the administration moves more forcefully across a range of policy fronts that sat quiet in much of his first term.

William Howell, a political science professor at the University of Chicago and the author of “Power Without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action,” isn’t surprised to see commandments coming at a rapid clip.

“In an era of polarized parties and a fragmented Congress, the opportunities to legislate are few and far between,” Howell said. “So presidents have powerful incentive to go it alone. And they do.”

And the political opposition howls.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a possible contender for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, said that on the gun-control front in particular, Obama is “abusing his power by imposing his policies via executive fiat instead of allowing them to be debated in Congress.”

The Republican reaction is to be expected, said John Woolley, co-director of the American Presidency Project at the University of California in Santa Barbara.

“For years there has been a growing concern about unchecked executive power,” Woolley said. “It tends to have a partisan content, with contemporary complaints coming from the incumbent president’s opponents.”

The power isn’t limitless, as was demonstrated when Obama issued one of his first executive orders, calling for closing the military prison at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba and trying suspected terrorists housed there in federal courts instead of by special military tribunals. Congress stepped in to prohibit moving any Guantanamo prisoners to the U.S., effectively blocking Obama’s plan to shutter the jail.

Among recent actions:

—Obama issued presidential memoranda on guns in tandem with his legislative effort to expand background checks and ban assault-type weapons and large capacity magazines. The steps include renewing federal gun research despite a law that has been interpreted as barring such research since 1996. Gun control was off the table in the campaign, as it had been for a decade, but the shooting at a Connecticut elementary school in December changed that overnight.

—The Labor Department approved new rules in January that could help save lives at dangerous mines with a pattern of safety violations. The rules were proposed shortly after an explosion killed 29 men at West Virginia’s Upper Big Branch mine in 2010, deadliest mining accident in 40 years. The rules had been in limbo ever since because of objections from mine operators.

—The government proposed fat, calorie, sugar and sodium limits in almost all food sold in schools, extending federal nutritional controls beyond subsidized lunches to include food sold in school vending machines and a la carte cafeteria lines. The new proposals flow from a 2010 law and are among several sidelined during the campaign.

The law provoked an outcry from conservatives who said the government was empowering itself to squash school bake sales and should not be telling kids what to eat. Updated regulations last year on subsidized school lunches produced a backlash, too, altogether making the government shy of further food regulation until the election passed. The new rules leave school fundraisers clear of federal regulation, alleviating fears of cupcake-crushing edicts at bake sales and the like.

—The Justice Department released an opinion that people with food allergies can be considered to have the rights of disabled people. The finding exposes schools, restaurants and other food-service places to more legal risk if they don’t accommodate patrons with food allergies.

—The White House said Obama intends to move forward on rules controlling carbon emissions from power plants as a central part of the effort to restrain climate change, which the president rarely talked about after global-warming legislation failed in his first term. With a major climate bill unlikely to get though a divided Congress, Obama is expected to rely on his executive authority to achieve whatever progress he makes on climate change.

The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to complete the first-ever limits on carbon pollution from new coal-fired power plants. The agency also probably will press ahead on rules for existing power plants, despite protests from industry and Republicans that such rules would raise electricity prices and kill off coal, the dominant U.S. energy source. Older coal-fired power plants have been shutting across the country because of low natural gas prices and weaker demand for electricity.

—In December, the government proposed long-delayed rules requiring automakers to install event data recorders, or “black boxes,” in all new cars and light trucks beginning Sept. 1, 2014. Most new cars are already getting them.

—The EPA proposed rules to update water quality guidelines for beaches and control runoff from logging roads.

As well, a new ozone rule probably will be completed this year, which would mean finally moving forward on a smog-control standard sidelined in 2011.

A regulation directing federal contractors to hire more disabled workers is somewhere in the offing at the Labor Department, as are ones to protect workers from lung-damaging silica and reduce the risk of deadly factory explosions from dust produced in the making of chemicals, plastics and metals.

Rules also are overdue on genetically modified salmon, catfish inspection, the definition of gluten-free in labeling and food import inspection. In one of the most closely watched cases, Obama could decide early this year whether to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas.

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Daly, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Mary Clare Jalonick and Sam Hananel contributed to this report.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Freedom, Health, Money, Obama, People, Personal Freedoms, Republicans, Taxes, White House | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Obama offers faith groups new birth control rule

Comment By Bob L.
02-03-2013

Was that real nice of Obama to have a second thought on Birth Control for Churches: (Administration officials said it would more simply define the religious organizations that are exempt from the requirement altogether. For example, a mosque whose food pantry serves the whole community would not have to comply.)

Boy is this a SLAP in the face to Americas Religious Organisations, WHO is Obama Working for? U.S. Citizens or Foreign Citizens, it sure does not look like America.

=========================================================================

Associated Press
By RACHEL ZOLL and RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press
Feb. 02, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — Facing a wave of lawsuits over what government can tell religious groups to do, the Obama administration is proposing a compromise for faith-based nonprofits that object to covering birth control in their employee health plans.

Some of the lawsuits appear headed for the Supreme Court, threatening another divisive legal battle over President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law, which requires most employers to cover birth control free of charge to female workers as a preventive service. The law exempted churches and other houses of worship, but religious charities, universities, hospitals and even some for-profit businesses have objected.

d1eb3354e1854e03280f6a7067008d76The government’s new offer, in a proposed regulation, has two parts.

Administration officials said it would more simply define the religious organizations that are exempt from the requirement altogether. For example, a mosque whose food pantry serves the whole community would not have to comply.

For other religious employers, the proposal attempts to create a buffer between them and contraception coverage. Female employees would still have free access through insurers or a third party, but the employer would not have to arrange for the coverage or pay for it. Insurers would be reimbursed for any costs by a credit against fees owed the government.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the plan would satisfy the objections of Roman Catholic charities and other faith-affiliated nonprofits nationwide challenging the requirement.

Neither the Catholic Health Association, a trade group for hospitals, nor the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops had an immediate reaction, saying the regulations were still being studied.

But the National Association of Evangelicals, which represents about 40 denominations and works with the administration on immigration and other issues, quickly rejected the rule. It said the change didn’t create enough of a buffer between faith groups and birth control coverage.

“The Obama administration should have done the right thing and dropped the contraception mandate, or at least should have exempted all religious organizations,” said Leith Anderson, the association’s president.

Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing religious nonprofits and businesses in lawsuits, said many of his clients will still have serious concerns.

“This is a moral decision for them,” Duncan said. “Why doesn’t the government just exempt them?”

Some women’s advocates were pleased.

“The important thing for us is that women employees can count on getting insurance that meets their needs, even if they’re working for a religiously affiliated employer,” said Cindy Pearson, executive director of the National Women’s Health Network.

Policy analyst Sarah Lipton-Lubet of the American Civil Liberties Union said the rule appeared to meet the ACLU’s goal of providing “seamless coverage.”

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement that the compromise would provide “women across the nation with coverage of recommended preventive care at no cost, while respecting religious concerns.”

The birth-control rule, first introduced a year ago, became an election issue, with some advocates for women praising the mandate as a victory but some religious leaders decrying it as an attack on faith groups.

The health care law requires most employers, including faith-affiliated hospitals and nonprofits, to provide preventive care at no charge to employees. Scientific advisers to the government recommended that artificial contraception, including sterilization, be included in a group of services for women. The goal, in part, is to help women space out pregnancies to promote health.

Under the original rule, only those religious groups that primarily employ and serve people of their own faith — such as churches — were exempt. But other religiously affiliated groups, such as church-affiliated universities, Catholic Charities and hospitals, were told they had to comply.

Catholic bishops, evangelicals and some religious leaders who have generally been supportive of Obama’s policies lobbied fiercely for a broader exemption. The Catholic Church prohibits the use of artificial contraception. Evangelicals generally accept the use of birth control, but some object to specific methods such as the morning-after contraceptive pill, which they argue is tantamount to abortion, and is covered by the policy.

Obama had promised to change the birth control requirement so insurance companies — and not faith-affiliated employers — would pay for the coverage, but religious leaders said more changes were needed to make the plan work.

Since then, more than 40 lawsuits have been filed by religious nonprofits and secular for-profit businesses contending the mandate violates their religious beliefs. As expected, this latest regulation does not provide any accommodation for individual business owners who have religious objections to the rule.

Questions remain about how the services ultimately will be funded. The Health and Human Services Department has not tallied an overall cost for the plan, according to Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, an HHS deputy policy director.

However, in its new version of the rule, the department argues that the change won’t impose new costs on insurers because it will save them money “from improvements in women’s health and fewer child births.”

The latest version of the mandate is now subject to a 60-day public comment period. The overall mandate is to take effect for religious nonprofits in August.

___

Zoll reported from New York. Associated Press writer David Crary in New York contributed.

Categories: America, Democrats, Health, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Profiling, Religion, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Thank You All For Putting Up With My Comments

Comment By Bob L.
01-31-2013

I would like to thank all of you who read and follow my ramblings, but what we need is more people here and around the world to stand up and be counted, but it is hard to sit back and watch what is happening to this country and around the world, we don’t need wars, what we need is people stop meddling in our lives and learn to live their own, they don’t like it when some one meddles [ if you don’t know (to involve oneself in a matter without right or invitation; interfere officiously and unwantedly: Stop meddling in my personal life!) in theirs, so like they say what goes around comes around, and who is paying the price, innocent people, this means kids too.

What I am saying is that there are so many Brain Dead people who are so Brain Washed into believing that the Government is doing a good job of protecting its people, but the problem is that they are protecting them selves, just look at what they have compared to the working class who every day goes to work and tries to provide for their families.

And who do we blame for people not being informed of what is going on in Washington DC, didn’t you know that Fox news is a Lier and miss inform the people about the real truth  about what going on, and the other news media is telling the truth, BOY if you believe that than you are very brain dead,  how about this. the problem is they won’t kiss his #$W#$@ like the rest.

When it comes to our Elected Nincompoops, they have Full Medical, Free Transportation, and Automatic Pay Raises, and you can not for get ARMED SECURITY, DO YOU, NO, you have to beg for yours every year or every three years, and then have the Government has the nerve to tell you NO, who are they protecting, you or Businesses, I think you know the answer to that, and for YOUR Security you sit back and watch it be taken away by Government Agencies, but you still have to pay for theirs. But yet they say the Government is doing a good job.

I am not against any one of them, I am against any one who does not stand up for the Constitution of the United States Of America, and the Bill Of Rights, and tries to destroy it, and what I have seen, this administration is doing a good job of it.

Categories: America, Democrats, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Local Governments, Obama, Politics, White House | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Fruits and Vegetables, WHO DO You Believe Any More?

Comment By Bob L
01-30-2013

Who do you believe any more, Farmers, Food and Drug, and CDC on what you can eat any more, first it was Tomatoes from the U.S. and cost Americans and farmers money, then came Beef, well if you like eating steroids that are illegal for you to use, then have at it, than some one came up with Animals that are raised in grass or are Organic are not good for you, AND now they are telling you that Fruits and Vegetables are bad for you, and they can kill you, so what is new today.

Government is good for putting a scare into what you can eat or not, do they have any thing better to do then spread WE THINK RUMORS that it is or is not good for you, WHY don’t they spend more time to be sure and less time saying that they need mor money to do their job, I don’t know about you I am getting tired of all this bullshit that this Government is peddling so they can get a bigger pay package and do nothing.

How much Tax Money is spent by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)  and Food and Drug each year in Foreign Countries and not here in this Country.

==============================================================

Study says leafy greens top food poisoning source

Associated Press
By MIKE STOBBE | Associated Press
Tue, Jan 29, 2013

NEW YORK (AP) — A big government study has fingered leafy greens like lettuce and spinach as the leading source of food poisoning, a perhaps uncomfortable conclusion for health officials who want us to eat our vegetables.

“Most meals are safe,” said Dr. Patricia Griffin, a government researcher and one of the study’s authors who said the finding shouldn’t discourage people from eating produce. Experts repeated often-heard advice: Be sure to wash those foods or cook them thoroughly.

While more people may have gotten sick from plants, more died from contaminated poultry, the study also found. The results were released Tuesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Each year roughly 1 in 6 Americans — or 48 million people— gets sick from food poisoning. That includes 128,000 hospitalization and 3,000 deaths, according to previous CDC estimates.

The new report is the most comprehensive CDC has produced on the sources of food poisoning, covering the years 1998 through 2008. It reflects the agency’s growing sophistication at monitoring illnesses and finding their source.

What jumped out at the researchers was the role fruits and vegetables played in food poisonings, said Griffin, who heads the CDC office that handles foodborne infection surveillance and analysis.

About 1 in 5 illnesses were linked to leafy green vegetables — more than any other type of food. And nearly half of all food poisonings were attributed to produce in general, when illnesses from other fruits and vegetables were added in.

It’s been kind of a tough month for vegetables. A controversy erupted when Taco Bell started airing a TV ad for its variety 12-pack of tacos, with a voiceover saying that bringing a vegetable tray to a football party is “like punting on fourth-and-1.” It said that people secretly hate guests who bring vegetables to parties.

The fast-food chain on Monday announced it was pulling the commercial after receiving complaints that it discouraged people from eating vegetables.

Without actually saying so, the CDC report suggests that the Food and Drug Administration should devote more staff time and other resources to inspection of fruits and vegetables, said Michael Doyle, director of the University of Georgia’s Center for Food Safety.

Earlier this month, the FDA released a proposed new rule for produce safety that would set new hygiene standards for farm workers and for trying to reduce contact with animal waste and dirty water.

Meanwhile, CDC officials emphasized that their report should not be seen as discouraging people from eating vegetables.

Many of the vegetable-related illnesses come from norovirus, which is often spread by cooks and food handlers. So contamination sometimes has more to do with the kitchen or restaurant it came from then the food itself, Griffin noted.

Also, while vegetable-related illnesses were more common, they were not the most dangerous. The largest proportion of foodborne illness deaths — about 1 in 5 — were due to poultry. That was partly because three big outbreaks more than 10 years ago linked to turkey deli meat.

But it was close. CDC estimated 277 poultry-related deaths in 1998-2008, compared to 236 vegetable-related deaths.

Fruits and nuts were credited with 96 additional deaths, making 334 total deaths for produce of all types. The CDC estimated 417 deaths from all kinds of meat and poultry, another 140 from dairy and 71 from eggs.

Red meat was once seen as one of the leading sources of food poisoning, partly because of a deadly outbreak of E. coli associated with hamburger. But Griffin and Doyle said there have been significant safety improvements in beef handling. In the study, beef was the source of fewer than 4 percent of food-related deaths and fewer than 7 percent of illnesses.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Health, Money, Obama, People, Politics, White House | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Worst Things for Your Pocket Book, Government Meddling

Comment: By Bob L.
01-28-2013

229935_321805554571017_597402207_nThe problem with owning a car is Government regulations, they tell you how much you will pay for Gas and how much you will burn by setting them to run rich, Licensing, Taxes, if you can not smell it when you drive your car and get around other cars running, then your nose is burned from all the gas fumes.

Why did they stop using the tail pipe test on E check, could it be that it would show that your car is burning more gas than it is supposed to, and is that why they only go by what the computer says, to show that you have not tried to or set your car to get better gas mileage by setting it to run more efficiently, the Government does not want that, because if you could get your car to run cheaper,  they would lose money, just like they are with Electric Cars today that don’t use gas to operate.

562400_296927200392186_1025521175_nIf you have not noticed they now want to charge a mileage tax for what they are losing on their gas tax, and this is basically why you have to take your car to a Car Dealer so you have to pay them for repairs and no one else, just think how many qualified mechanics have been put out of work because of Government Meddling because of Lobbyists, I think this is what Government wants so they have full control of the people (Dictator), so they can charge more TAXES without a fight from the people.

===========================================================

The 10 Worst Things You Can Do to Your Car

Business Insider

By Mandi Woodruff | Business Insider
Fri, Jan 25, 2013

Like the human body, ignoring even the smallest signs of trouble in your car’s performance can lead to trouble down the road.

And some missed signals cost more than others.

A new report by CarMD.com Corporation  details exactly which maintenance mistakes can cause the most damage.

Here are the top 10: 

1.  Putting off recommended / scheduled maintenance

2. Ignoring the “check engine” light

3. Not changing the oil, or not having it changed on time

4. Not checking tire pressure

5. Neglecting coolant, brake, transmission and other fluid services

6. Continuing to drive when the vehicle is overheating

7. Not changing fuel and air filters

8. Having unqualified shops service your vehicle

9. Using generic aftermarket parts instead of original equipment manufacturer (OEM)-quality parts

10. Trying to service your own high-tech vehicle

The best example of the snowball effect of missed car repairs is the air filter. It costs about 20 bucks to replace, but if left alone, a dirty filter can bust oxygen (02) sensors in cars, which cost as much as $250 to replace. And when the sensor fails, you’ll first see your gas mileage plunge, then possibly wind up with a $1,000 bill to replace your  catalytic converter.

No. 3 deserves special attention, as well. Technicians say ignoring oil changes is the “single most damaging  car maintenance item that their customers neglect that they wish they could change,” according to CarMD.

The trouble with dirty oil is that it doesn’t jive well with the high-tech engines in today’s modern vehicles, according to  Art Jacobsen, CarMD vice president, and can lead to engine failure if left ignored for too long.

The old go-to rule for oil changes was to refresh every 3,000 miles. But most experts agree drivers should go by the schedule their car’s manufacturer dictates instead.

“Frequent oil changes do not necessarily mean better performance or longer engine life,” CalRecycle Director Caroll Mortensen told The Auto Channel.

More From Business Insider

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, Rich, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

How Many Times Can Some One Break The Law Before Some Thing Is Done?

Court says Obama recess appointments invalid

By Aruna Viswanatha, Emily Stephenson – Reuters
01-25-2013

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A federal appeals court on Friday invalidated President Barack Obama’s “recess” appointments to a labor board last year, ruling that the move was unconstitutional and dealing a blow to Obama’s strategy of bypassing Senate Republicans.

The three appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in January 2012 were made while the Senate was out of town but potentially available to act on them.

“Considering the text, history, and structure of the Constitution, these appointments were invalid from their inception,” the panel said.

Obama also used such a “recess” appointment last January to install Richard Cordray as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, although his appointment was not part of the lawsuit.

The suit started as a routine dispute between soda bottling company Noel Canning and the labor board, but lawyers for Senate Republicans seized on the suit as a chance to challenge the appointments.

The case was seen as a test of the limits of the president’s ability to make appointments during a Senate recess, a power that bypasses the Senate’s usual ability to block nominees and that dates to the U.S. Constitution of 1787.

At the time, the Senate was not officially in recess, meeting every few days for minutes at a time but accomplishing no work and with few senators present. Meanwhile, Obama’s nominees remained on the Senate’s calendar, blocked by Republicans from up or down votes on their confirmation.

Nancy Cleeland, a spokeswoman for the NLRB, had no immediate comment.

Cordray’s appointment was challenged in a separate lawsuit brought in June by the State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, and other institutions. That suit presented a similar argument that the recess appointment was invalid because the Senate was technically in session.

Cordray’s appointment followed months of rancorous debate over the new consumer bureau, which was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial oversight law to police markets for products such as credit cards and home loans.

Once rare, recess appointments became more common in the late 1970s as a way to bypass the confirmation process, which senators have used increasingly to block nominees of both Republican and Democratic presidents.

Recent presidents pushed the boundaries. George W. Bush took the rare step of filling a judgeship during a recess, while Obama appointed the NLRB members while the Senate was holding “skeleton” sessions set up to keep it from going into recess.

Categories: America, Democrats, Money, Obama, Politics, Republicans, Unions, White House | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Gun Violence Who IS to Blame, YOU ARE!

Comment By Bob L.
01-24-2013

All you HYPOCRITES, before you jump on the GUN BAN band wagon, you better stop admiring your self in the mirror and take a REAL GOOD LOOK at your self and what you have done.

I can remember in the earlier years when you went out side and played Cowboys and Indians, your parents told us that you don’t point any thing at any one unless you planed to kill them, in other words you never point any thing at any one, BUT as these kids grew up they decided that there was nothing wrong with pointing toy guns while playing.

th 3Now look at where we are at today, Violent MOVIES, JWI_LaserTagVIDEO GAMES, LASER TAG, and PAINT BALL, and NOW they have added this, REAL GUNS, now WHO do you think is responsible, YOU YES YOU, you are the ones who gave your kids any thing they wanted, so now who do you want to blame, NOW YOU CAN LOOK IN THE MIRROR and see what a hypocrite looks like.

MIRROR MIRROR ON THE WALL WHO IS THE FAIREST OF THEM ALL, gee don’t I look good, now who looks good, YOU or the DEAD that you killed.

Good luck all you YUPPIES that want every thing, well now you are going to pay the price.

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Health, Money, Obama, People, Republicans, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

This Sounds Very Familiar to the United States, Hurry Up and Die

Comment: Yup
01-23-2013

I started to read this article and thought it was talking about here in this country before it dawned that it was Japan, but it sure could be here the way this administration wants to take every thing away from the older and sick to keep spending this Country into BANKRUPTCY.

Hurry Up and Die so we can get more money out of you, remember the Death, Inheritance and any other tax they can find before they let you go, and then, go after your Family to get the rest, this includes Federal, State,County, and City, they will never rest until they get it all, and put you into Bankruptcy, so they can tax that too.


WOW this is to close to Home here in the U.S.

===============================================================

Japan Official: ‘Hurry Up and Die’

By Akiko Fujita ABC News Blogs
01-23-2013

TOKYO – Taro Aso has never been one to hold his tongue. But Japan’s 72 year-old deputy prime minister may have outdone himself with his latest gaffe.

At a government panel to discuss social security reforms, the former prime minister called the elderly who are unable to feed themselves “tube people,” then proceeded to say the elderly should be allowed to “hurry up and die” to reduce the burden on a country tasked to pay for their medical expenses.

Adding his personal experience, Aso said he had already written a will, directing his family to let him “hurry up and die,” refusing end-of-life care.

“Even if (doctors) said they could keep me alive, it would be unbearable,” he said. “I would feel guilty, knowing that (treatment) was being paid for by the government.”

Aso later argued that his comments were misinterpreted. He was speaking about his personal wishes, not those of all senior citizens.

The issue of elderly care remains a major challenge for Japan, the world’s fastest aging country. Nearly a quarter of the population is 65 and older, with that number expected to spike to 40 percent in the next 50 years. Concerns about financial strains placed on social security and pension systems are so grave, lawmakers passed an unpopular tax hike bill last summer, agreeing to double the sales tax to 10 percent over the next three years.

Aso has a history of verbal blunders. He once compared an opposition party to the Nazis, and said he wanted Japan to become the kind of country “the richest Jews would want to live.” In 2008, while still prime minister, Aso called the elderly a “feeble” group.

“Why should I have to pay taxes for people who just sit around and do nothing but eat and drink?” he said at the time.

He later apologized for his comments on national TV.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Health, Home Less, Money, Obama, People, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Truth About the People and the Government

Comment: By Bob L.
01-17-2013 or is 1920′s??
Going into the 30′s

dunce-cap-hatI might have some dumb comments, but they are no dumber than the way people act and things they do today, it is what I see and read that makes my opinion, Some might not be a true story today but usually ends up true later, but it is how I see it, and usually it does becomes fact down the road.

I remember a few years back when Nixon was elected on his Honesty, yet some did not trust him, and wallah look what happen, then no one admitted that they voted for him, well here we go again, another Honest President that has not done any thing but protect him self and his Family for life, but not YOURS, but a President who has done every thing to bring this country down, I have not seen so many U.S. Citizens so BRAIN WASHED  or BRAIN DEAD do so little to protect this County where they were born, I could say more, but that will be another Dumb story to what I see going on in this Country today from the past years.

How many of you will admit that things are going back to when the only way to have a job Guaranteed was to be a slave, from what I can see the last Four years is that slavery and Discrimination are coming back, but this time you have a four class system, Rich, Government, Middle, and the Slaves, it use to be Rich, Government, and Slaves.

Electric_Blue_Animated_Text_Terms_And_Conditions_8
Lets start at the top of the chart, the Rich will still not pay their fair share of taxes, they tell the Government what to do, the Government does what they are told, so the Government tells the Middle and the Slaves what they can earn and how they will be taxed, the Middle thumbs their nose at the poor and Elderly and tells them where they are going to live, and the Middle is one of the reasons why the Poor and the Elderly have a hard time to find a place to live, and why there are more homeless.

OCCUPYWh10The POINT is, it is the PEOPLE who are the ones that are plotting the future of our Children not the Government, the Government only does what the People want, and that is the problem, the People today want more than they need, look around you, look at what your wants and gotta haves are doing to this Country, and who is going to pay for this all, if you have not figured it out by now than you are one of those DUMB and STUPID YUPPIES that gotta have the best of every thing, and bar the door untill you get it, while in the mean time you are putting your Children and Grandchildren in the poor house, so don’t blame one person, you are ALL TO BLAME, from the very Top to the to the very Bottom.

Today we have to many nambypambies that want it all but will not fight to protect it, but now that they are about to lose it, they are crying the blues, YUPPIES you can not have it both ways, you have to fight to protect it, or just sit back and let your freedoms go on its way of Cuba, China and North Korea, or under control of a Hitler type of Government where people are Executed by GAS because they do not like who you are. (DISCRIMINATION of your NATIONALITY)

Categories: America, Freedom, Greed, Home Less, Money, Obama, People, Personal Freedoms, Politics, Profiling, Taxes, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Tax Your Self InTo Depression For Greed

Comment By Bob L.
01-15-2013

depressionI sat in on a meeting at an apartment complex where I live, they make a comment about making a Profit when asked about why rents keep going up on people who don’t get pay raises every year, his comment was we have to make a profit for their supporters, but yet they advertise that they are a Nonprofit Company, and when asked about how they determine what rents will be, their comment was they are based on median pay of the area, than this is not fair for people who don’t have the advantage to get these big pay checks, so with pay that keep going up puts more people with out a place to live, it comes to the point a Roof money no food, Food money or Death, no Question, Death comes with both, Roof an address, Food NO Address No Money still death, because the Government requires an active address to get money.

If you are smart enough, you can see that all these tax increases go to higher Rents, Home and Business cost, I see it as not for health safety and maintenance they keep saying, all I see as GREED for pay raises, look around you, do you see these improvements that they talk about, I don’t, I still see Schools asking for more money for maintenance, same goes for Cities, Counties, and State, but they never get done, and when asked, we had to spend the money else where, same story every time, but you always hear about Pay Raises about that same time they go for tax increases, how much maintenance have you seen, I don’t mean planting Trees and Flowers in left turn lanes, building Traffic Circles, that is not maintenance, that is waste.

I would say that these taxes that they ask for go to Pay Raises for Public Employees while people on minimum wage or on a set income pay the price for the GREEDY to making big money, it is these people who are putting people on the street and living in  their cars, on benches, and alleys, and the Government YUPPIES of today are the blame for all these taxes and not knowing when to say NO, this is what all this College Education has done to society today, education is doing nothing but teach GREED, not logic about what can happen with the wrong program they plan to do.

People can make a difference, if they would   stop wanting the moon and tell these Politicians to  use the money for the people, not themselves, people and business could stop this runaway taxes if they really cared about this Country and not their pocket-book, then profit would follow, but they want it now.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Local Governments, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Rich, SAFETY, White House, Yuppies | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Hospitals crack down on workers refusing flu shots

Comment: By Bob L.
01-13-2013

Maybe they know some thing that they are not allowed to talk about for fear of being sued.

 

But if you look at the flu, every year gets worse, WHY, did any one ever do a study on why, NO, just like every thing else, they are protecting the Pharmaceutical Companies and their profits, if that was not the truth then why are they pushing so many of these drugs that make people sick, just take the time and read how bad these drugs are and their side effects, and what is happening to those who are taking them, and how many drugs that they are on that they don’t need.

Why don’t they spend as much money on why and how to prevent Illness, as they do on dumping money on these unsafe drugs that do nothing but make people sicker. They dump a lot of money in to studies on Frogs mating habits, frisbees what makes them fly, Turtle crossing, Overpasses for Wild Animals to get to the other side of a Road so they don’t get hit, you can go on with waste, and they will never put it where it can be used right.

There are Doctors out there that do nothing but push Prescription Drugs, then wonder why they must have Malpractice Insurance and getting them selves and other Doctors sued.

There are Doctors out there that are taking people off these drugs because they are the cause of problems, and this could be why the flu gets worse every year, because people’s immune system can no longer fight off these diseases because of over use of Prescription Drugs .

If you know some one who has been taken off of some of their drugs, see if they have improved from what they were like before, my self, I have seen a big improvement in a lot of my friends who stopped taking some of their pills, and they found out that these pills reacted against one another, which was causing people to visit their Doctor or Emergency Room more often. (could this be about money)

=============================================================================================

Hospitals crack down on workers refusing flu shots

By LINDSEY TANNER, Associated Press
Jan. 12, 2013

CHICAGO (AP) — Patients can refuse a flu shot. Should doctors and nurses have that right, too? That is the thorny question surfacing as U.S. hospitals increasingly crack down on employees who won’t get flu shots, with some workers losing their jobs over their refusal.

“Where does it say that I am no longer a patient if I’m a nurse,” wondered Carrie Calhoun, a longtime critical care nurse in suburban Chicago who was fired last month after she refused a flu shot.

Hospitals’ get-tougher measures coincide with an earlier-than-usual flu season hitting harder than in recent mild seasons. Flu is widespread in most states, and at least 20 children have died.

Most doctors and nurses do get flu shots. But in the past two months, at least 15 nurses and other hospital staffers in four states have been fired for refusing, and several others have resigned, according to affected workers, hospital authorities and published reports.

In Rhode Island, one of three states with tough penalties behind a mandatory vaccine policy for health care workers, more than 1,000 workers recently signed a petition opposing the policy, according to a labor union that has filed suit to end the regulation.

Why would people whose job is to protect sick patients refuse a flu shot? The reasons vary: allergies to flu vaccine, which are rare; religious objections; and skepticism about whether vaccinating health workers will prevent flu in patients.

Dr. Carolyn Bridges, associate director for adult immunization at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, says the strongest evidence is from studies in nursing homes, linking flu vaccination among health care workers with fewer patient deaths from all causes.

“We would all like to see stronger data,” she said. But other evidence shows flu vaccination “significantly decreases” flu cases, she said. “It should work the same in a health care worker versus somebody out in the community.”

Cancer nurse Joyce Gingerich is among the skeptics and says her decision to avoid the shot is mostly “a personal thing.” She’s among seven employees at IU Health Goshen Hospital in northern Indiana who were recently fired for refusing flu shots. Gingerich said she gets other vaccinations but thinks it should be a choice. She opposes “the injustice of being forced to put something in my body.”

Medical ethicist Art Caplan says health care workers’ ethical obligation to protect patients trumps their individual rights.

“If you don’t want to do it, you shouldn’t work in that environment,” said Caplan, medical ethics chief at New York University’s Langone Medical Center. “Patients should demand that their health care provider gets flu shots — and they should ask them.”

For some people, flu causes only mild symptoms. But it can also lead to pneumonia, and there are thousands of hospitalizations and deaths each year. The number of deaths has varied in recent decades from about 3,000 to 49,000.

A survey by CDC researchers found that in 2011, more than 400 U.S. hospitals required flu vaccinations for their employees and 29 hospitals fired unvaccinated employees.

At Calhoun’s hospital, Alexian Brothers Medical Center in Elk Grove Village, Ill., unvaccinated workers granted exemptions must wear masks and tell patients, “I’m wearing the mask for your safety,” Calhoun says. She says that’s discriminatory and may make patients want to avoid “the dirty nurse” with the mask.

The hospital justified its vaccination policy in an email, citing the CDC’s warning that this year’s flu outbreak was “expected to be among the worst in a decade” and noted that Illinois has already been hit especially hard. The mandatory vaccine policy “is consistent with our health system’s mission to provide the safest environment possible.”

The government recommends flu shots for nearly everyone, starting at age 6 months. Vaccination rates among the general public are generally lower than among health care workers.

According to the most recent federal data, about 63 percent of U.S. health care workers had flu shots as of November. That’s up from previous years, but the government wants 90 percent coverage of health care workers by 2020.

The highest rate, about 88 percent, was among pharmacists, followed by doctors at 84 percent, and nurses, 82 percent. Fewer than half of nursing assistants and aides are vaccinated, Bridges said.

Some hospitals have achieved 90 percent but many fall short. A government health advisory panel has urged those below 90 percent to consider a mandatory program.

Also, the accreditation body over hospitals requires them to offer flu vaccines to workers, and those failing to do that and improve vaccination rates could lose accreditation.

Starting this year, the government’s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is requiring hospitals to report employees’ flu vaccination rates as a means to boost the rates, the CDC’s Bridges said. Eventually the data will be posted on the agency’s “Hospital Compare” website.

Several leading doctor groups support mandatory flu shots for workers. And the American Medical Association in November endorsed mandatory shots for those with direct patient contact in nursing homes; elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to flu-related complications. The American Nurses Association supports mandates if they’re adopted at the state level and affect all hospitals, but also says exceptions should be allowed for medical or religious reasons.

Mandates for vaccinating health care workers against other diseases, including measles, mumps and hepatitis, are widely accepted. But some workers have less faith that flu shots work — partly because there are several types of flu virus that often differ each season and manufacturers must reformulate vaccines to try and match the circulating strains.

While not 100 percent effective, this year’s vaccine is a good match, the CDC’s Bridges said.

Several states have laws or regulations requiring flu vaccination for health care workers but only three — Arkansas, Maine and Rhode Island — spell out penalties for those who refuse, according to Alexandra Stewart, a George Washington University expert in immunization policy and co-author of a study appearing this month in the journal Vaccine.

Rhode Island’s regulation, enacted in December, may be the toughest and is being challenged in court by a health workers union. The rule allows exemptions for religious or medical reasons, but requires unvaccinated workers in contact with patients to wear face masks during flu season. Employees who refuse the masks can be fined $100 and may face a complaint or reprimand for unprofessional conduct that could result in losing their professional license.

Some Rhode Island hospitals post signs announcing that workers wearing masks have not received flu shots. Opponents say the masks violate their health privacy.

“We really strongly support the goal of increasing vaccination rates among health care workers and among the population as a whole,” but it should be voluntary, said SEIU Healthcare Employees Union spokesman Chas Walker.

Supporters of health care worker mandates note that to protect public health, courts have endorsed forced vaccination laws affecting the general population during disease outbreaks, and have upheld vaccination requirements for schoolchildren.

Cases involving flu vaccine mandates for health workers have had less success. A 2009 New York state regulation mandating health care worker vaccinations for swine flu and seasonal flu was challenged in court but was later rescinded because of a vaccine shortage. And labor unions have challenged individual hospital mandates enacted without collective bargaining; an appeals court upheld that argument in 2007 in a widely cited case involving Virginia Mason Hospital in Seattle.

Calhoun, the Illinois nurse, says she is unsure of her options.

“Most of the hospitals in my area are all implementing these policies,” she said. “This conflict could end the career I have dedicated myself to.”

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Health, Jobs, Money, People, Personal Freedoms, White House | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Guns, Lighters, Matches, and People Control, What Next?????

Comment By Bob L.
01-07-2013

Guns, Lighters, Matches, and People Control, What Next?. How about lighter fluid, gasoline, or is about any thing that can KILL, the worry about this type of violence is coming right from the people Government wants to protect, well it is not the average American, it is for people to have an open door to come in to this Country and not worry about having People stand up to them, and this could be why they don’t want to close our Borders and make it harder for them to come in.

This administration is sure doing a lot to protect Criminals, and Terrorist with all these means to have all these things at their disposal,  and not the American Citizen to protect themselves from harm by them, and now you have the News Media helping them to go after the ones who have the means to stop them by posting their names and addresses, so if any harm comes to these people like setting their home on fire, ambushing them, or kidnaping their kids, I would hold them responsible for any action against them.

Truth or Not, it can be the next thing, well they have Semiautomatic th 1Lighters, Quick Strike Matches, and Flammable Liquids, and as the story says, Explosives.

When did we STOP Enforcing the laws we all ready HAVE.

How about Enforcing the U.S. Constitution. By The People For The People, and start Enforcing the laws we have Now and stop adding new.

==============================================================================

Ala. teen accused of plotting to bomb classmates

Associated Press

01-07-2013

SEALE, Ala. (AP) — An eastern Alabama high school student faces an attempted assault charge after authorities say he planned to use homemade explosives in a terrorist attack on fellow students at his school.

Authorities say 17-year-old Derek Shrout, a student at Russell County High School in Seale, will appear at a Monday afternoon court hearing.

Russell County Sheriff Heath Taylor tells WTVM-TV that a journal found by a teacher and turned over to authorities outlined the plans and named six students and one teacher.

Taylor tells the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer that a search of Shrout’s home found several small tobacco cans and two large cans, all with holes drilled in them and containing pellets. Taylor said the devices were just “a step or two away from being ready to explode.”

Categories: America, Democrats, Education, Health, Money, Obama, People, SAFETY, White House | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Politicians Talk Big and People Complain

Comment By Bob L.
01-04-2013

piggy-bankPoliticians Talk Big and People complain that the GOP doesn’t care, but when the Democrats have control they do nothing wrong, now do you think that the Democrats could any better, well not unless they can put a lot of pork in the bills to help their state or their Lobbyist, well that’s what they put in the sandy recovery bill and the Republicans said that they were not going to pass it with all that pork in it, and if you noticed they did pass it after most of the pork was taken out.

Now get your head out of your #$% and start getting this spending under control and put PORK back with a PIG, not with a spending bill, and then maybe this country might get back to saving money, creating jobs and putting it where it belongs, IN THE BANK until it is  needed and not spending at will to get reelected. If they are worried about getting reelected then they are not doing the job for what they were elected for.

There are a lot of entitlements that they don’t want to do away with, because it would mean that they would not get reelected if they tampered with them, so they go after the ones that will hurt more people and kill them or put them out on the street, because they would not be able to afford to have a place to live.

Now that they have taken out some of the pork, the bill Passed, so blame the Democrats for loading it down with PORK and I don’t mean PIGS.

===============================================================================

House approves funding for Sandy insurance claims

By Chris Moody, Yahoo! News The Ticket
01-04-2013

Still under pressure to provide federal aid to victims of Superstorm Sandy, the House on Friday voted to increase the borrowing limit for the National Flood Insurance Program, which will pay out 140,000 insurance claims for property damage.

The federal program offers subsidized insurance plans to homeowners who live near the nation’s coasts, and it was on track to run out of money by next week if Congress did not act. The payouts in the bill will cost the federal government $9.7 billion.

Local leaders from areas hit hardest by the storm were outraged this week that the congressional vote on the extended funding did not come sooner.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie on Thursday lashed out at Congress for failing to act, placing particular blame on House Speaker John Boehner.

“There’s only one group to blame for the continued suffering of these innocent victims, the House majority and their speaker, John Boehner,” Christie said.

Now the bill has passed the House, the Senate intends to pass the measure on to President Barack Obama using an expedited process that requires no vote.

The funding increase to the insurance program is just the first step in a series of votes related to Sandy. The House plans to vote again later this month on a $51 billion package in relief aid to state governments still rebuilding after the storm.

Categories: America, Democrats, Home Less, Jobs, Money, Obama, People, Politics, Unemployed, White House | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Working Poor Expected to Pay for More Pork

Comment By Bob L.
01-03-2013

Chris Christie blasted House Speaker John Boehner over sandy clean up, but where is the truth about why it has been left out, is it because that the senate put a bundle of PORK that they are good for in that bill to cover up their spending for their cronies, or their States so they can get reelected.

It seems that some one forgot to add that in to the news, is that because the news media can only see what Democrats want them to print.

Government_-_SpendingFrom what I can see is that there are some in Washington who are trying to stop wild spending that Obama and the Democrats are good for, but there are many in DC that are there only for money and perks, not for the good of America, but there some that are like people who stand in front of a mirror and take a picture and admire them selves and can not see problems coming until it arrives, and then the blame game starts, which shows the mentality of who is running this country and why nothing gets done.

People say that the Republicans don’t care about the people, I would say that saved a lot of money that the Americans would dish out in higher taxes, and not do what it was supposed to do, just like Obamacare, it should say Obama tax increase care which is still not known to what the cost to taxpayers.

LETS START PUTTING THE BLAME WHERE IT ALL BELONGS, ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, FEDERAL, STATES, COUNTIES, and CITIES.

The People you elected, they Don’t Care, they now have a blank check to do with what ever they want.

==================================================================================================

Human Events Blog

Super-storm of pork hits Washington

By:John Hayward
1/2/2013

Now that fiscal cliff panic is under control, we can return to panicking over Super Storm Sandy, which flooded the streets of Washington with juicy pork.  One of the few people in D.C. who still counts calories while everyone else stampeded for Sandy’s Real Fiscal Pit Bar-B-Q, House Oversight Committee chairman Darrell Issa, sized up the Senate’s “relief” package and said, “They sent us a bunch of pork and then left town, and that was just wrong.  And the speaker has the support of the majority of Republicans that if we’re going to provide relief, we can’t allow it to be doubled with unrelated pork no matter where the relief is.  And the relief will come early next year but it will come at the $27 billion level or I don’t expect to be voting for it.”

What the House actually got from the Senate is more like $60 billion, and contains urgent relief for the unfortunate residents of Sandy-devastated areas in New York and New Jersey, in addition to:

A new roof for the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C.

Money for fisheries in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and American Samoa.

$100 million for Head Start programs, one of Washington’s favorite education projects.

$800 million for federal harbor and dredging projects that will mostly occur in the St. Louis area.

Army Corps of Engineers funding related to the study of “climate change.”

A nationwide study of water resources.

The cancellation of loans dating back to Hurricane Katrina, including after-the-fact subsidies to communities that actually repaid their loans.

Over a billion dollars for highways and trains, including almost $200 million for a massive Amtrak project in the Northeast that has been under way for years.

$150 million for rebuilding parks, refuges, and recreational areas.

Much of the spending that would occur in the areas affected by Sandy have little or nothing to do with emergency hurricane disaster relief, as an extensive study from Taxpayers for Common Sense points out.  There’s money for all manner of long-term studies; funding for Housing and Urban Development projects; new equipment for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and even money to replace vehicles from federal agencies such as the FBI and Immigration.

As with the Amtrak project mentioned above, a great deal of this money would be sluiced into projects that were under way long before Sandy struck.  Some analysts say less than $13 billion of the bloated Senate package actually constitutes immediate disaster-related spending.

This Sandy bill, far from being an urgent act of relief for the tragic victims of the storm, is a full-on national disgrace.  It’s a bitterly cynical effort to extort the American people, using the Sandy victims as leverage.  We should be howling for the heads of those who stuffed it full of pork, whether their constituents live in New York or not.

And we should heap shame upon those who insist the bill get passed in a blind rush of full-scale unreasoning panic, as if hungry people in the Tri-State Area will keel over dead unless Congress acts immediately.  There is time to deliberate carefully and prepare a better bill.  FEMA still has ample funding for immediate disaster relief.  There is one significant legislative obstacle in the way, the impending shortfall of a key flood-relief fund, but there are many ways of dealing with such a problem without slipping on blindfolds and launching bags of money at American Samoa with a catapult.  At the very least, since so much of the spending in the “Super Storm Sandy Emergency Relief Bill” wouldn’t occur for months, or even years, shouldn’t the new Congress have an opportunity to discuss it and vote on it?

But instead, the powerful new “never let a good crisis go to waste” mentality is in full effect, so everyone involved in delaying a vote is suffering castigation as a “chucklehead” whose actions are “indefensible”… and that’s coming from two Republican representatives, Steve LaTourette of Ohio and Peter King of New York, respectively.  Washington spends money it doesn’t have, lies about what it’s paying for, and insists that the only thing our titanic central government cannot afford is time for proper deliberation.

Categories: America, Democrats, Greed, Obama, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment
 
 

Comment By Bob L.
January 1 2013

OldManOnComputerI would like to thank you all who have followed me through good or bad post continue reading, some times I misspell or miss use a word, what do you expect from an Old Fart who has seen a lot of change and how it has hurt a lot of Americans through the years, SEASONS GREETINGS TO HOPEFULLY A BETTER YEAR.

I hope to see that every one gets to have a HAPPY New Year, but  the way this Government  put their priority’s to give them selves more power, I don’t see any way that 2013 is going to be any better, but if I heard the news right, Obama wants to give them selves a Nine Hundred Dollar Pay-raise ($900.00) that Obama passed last week, Plus restore their Cost of living, that to me is a slap in the face to all the people who are close to being home less on minimum wage or getting only Four Hours of work a day, and who don’t get the advantage of cost of living raises.

I have to look back to years growing up and seeing the Working people getting cuts that the Government has added to them selves, they expect the people to work Three Hundred Sixty Five Days a year to pay more taxes plus give Companies more power against workers, and then you have Unions that have become a business in them selves and no longer protect its workers like they should, sure they look good standing up there and saying how much they are protecting the American worker, but when you get a pay raise how much do they get out of that raise, when you look at where they spend a lot of time, you can guess who is getting the benefits from the Government.

When I read an article, I look at what it could do to this Country if it was true or faults, and I feel that it is some thing that should be brought up, True or Faults, but some of these Faults stories some how end up becoming a law down the road and should be stopped before some Idiot thinks it is a good idea, and that is my opinion and hopefully that Americans believe too, and where this comes from is how the Government passes laws behind closed doors and keeping them Classified so the people don’t know what is in them, good example, Obamacare, does any one know what the total outcome is by the time it hits full power, signed, sealed and delivered behind closed doors, and told, you have to pass it if you want to know what is in it, the American People need to have these DOORS CLOSED meetings closed permanently.

Categories: America, Democrats, Obama, People, Politics, Republicans, White House | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Adventure Journal by Contexture International.

%d bloggers like this: