Kill Grandma, Grandpa, and the Disabled

Bob L.      Just My Opinion, BUT
May 21st 2015

Back when Obama was running for office he was pretty straightforward in letting every one know that he was not out to kill Grandma, Grandpa, or the Disabled, look at what has happen in these past few years, Governments have taken medical away from them and given it to the less needy, have given or working on giving Government workers raises and cost of living, that include Teachers and the Private Sector on slave wages, that includes raising minimum wage to Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) an hour, BUT.

What have they done for the Grandma, Grandpa, and the Disabled, they have cut their Medical, cut cost to a descent living wage, well you are probably the ones saying to your self, quit whining, well I don’t see any one else giving up their pay increases and whining that they are not getting paid enough, or with the cost of living going up faster than their wages.  

People who don’t have big retirements are now struggling to keep a Roof over their heads, buy Food, Clothing, and what ever they need to survive, you know people today are so greedy that they don’t even have any consideration for their elders, let alone their Children, the only thing that they want is a job that pays them to stay at home and get paid to do nothing, Oh they already do that and complain that they are not getting enough, and now the States are getting in the act to make it harder to survive for the low paid and out of work people.

So now here it comes, the people who are making money don’t care what happens to any one else as long as it does not affect them, so kill any one who gets in the way of their income, Two Articles below two show just that.

Inslee boosts state climate goal as cap-and-trade action stalls

Originally published May 20, 2015 at 10:23 pm

Gov. Jay Inslee has struggled to win legislative approval for a plan to meet state goals for greenhouse-gas reduction. But that isn’t stopping him from signing on to an international pact with even steeper targets.

By Jim Brunner

Seattle Times political reporter

Gov. Jay Inslee has failed so far to convince state legislators to go along with his proposal to meet official state greenhouse-gas-reduction targets through a new charge on carbon emissions.

But that’s not stopping the first-term Democrat from committing — symbolically at least — to even tougher climate goals.

Inslee this week joined leaders of 11 other states and provinces in the U.S., Mexico, Europe and Canada in signing an agreement that calls for cutting emissions of greenhouse gases to 80 to 95 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

That’s a steeper reduction than envisioned in a 2008 Washington law, which said the state would cut its emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to 50 percent of 1990 levels by 2050.

Most Read Stories

West Seattle couple leaves all their assets — $847,215 — to Uncle Sam

Thousands of teachers hit streets in Seattle — and Dems walk out, too

How far a $15 minimum wage goes in 6 US cities

For some parents, search for better schools could lead to jail

The Under 2 MOU, spearheaded by California Gov. Jerry Brown, is named after the goal of limiting global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels — a threshold scientists say is crucial to avoid dangerous climate-change impacts.

The pact is intended to galvanize action before a United Nations climate summit scheduled for Paris in December, according to Brown’s office.

Inslee, who has made fighting climate change a signature political priority, is considering attending the Paris talks, his office said Wednesday.

In a statement, Inslee said the threat of climate change “requires bold action at every level, and many of these actions must be done by local and state governments.”

The agreement he signed this week is largely symbolic and does not legally bind Washington state to any specific actions.

In an appendix to the Under 2 MOU, the Inslee administration listed ongoing efforts, including the governor’s stalled cap-and-trade legislation, ending reliance on coal-generated electricity and a potential new clean-fuel standard.

Inslee’s endorsement of the new climate agreement drew criticism from a Republican state legislator.

“I think it’s pretty extreme,” said Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy, one of two GOP representatives on a bipartisan panel that has studied state climate policy.

Short said Washington has done “a great job” keeping emissions relatively low and worried Inslee will use the new pact to push regulations that would hurt the state’s economy and quality of life.

“We have periods of warming. We have periods of cooling. I don’t know what to make of that,” she said. “If you took Washington emissions and you reduce everything, in the global picture, it would amount to nothing.”

Along with Washington and California, the “founding signatories” of the Under 2 MOU include Vermont and Oregon, as well as Acre, Brazil; Baden-Württemberg, Germany; Baja California, Mexico; Catalonia, Spain; Jalisco, Mexico; Ontario, Canada; British Columbia, Canada; and Wales, U.K.

Jaime Smith, an Inslee spokeswoman, said that with gridlock at the federal level, the governor sees value in a partnership with other like-minded state and provincial leaders to create momentum on climate action.

The three West Coast states and British Columbia combined would amount to the fifth-largest economy in the world. “You are talking about a pretty significant economic force,” she said.

Inslee and other regional leaders signed a similarly nonbinding climate-action agreement in 2013, in which Inslee vowed to “set binding limits on carbon emissions and deploy market mechanisms to meet those limits.”

That led to the governor’s cap-and-trade legislation, which would limit overall carbon emissions and require top emitters — including refineries, power plants and steel manufacturers — to buy new pollution permits.

Inslee wanted to devote the nearly $1 billion a year the plan would raise to schools, transportation projects and other state priorities. But his bill has failed to pass even in the Democratic-majority state House.

Washington’s greenhouse-gas targets go back to 2008, when then-Gov. Chris Gregoire and the Legislature approved a law committing the state to lowering emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, to 25 percent below that by 2035, and to 50 percent below that by 2050.

But as Inslee has frequently pointed out, lawmakers have refused to adopt a binding plan to meet those goals. Like Inslee, Gregoire pushed for a cap-and-trade bill in 2009 but it failed despite Democrats controlling both houses of the Legislature that year.

Washington’s overall emissions have remained relatively flat in recent years despite a growing population, according to the state Department of Ecology.

But without policy changes such as the cap-and-trade proposal, the state is currently projected to fall short of the 2020 target contained in current law, said Hedia Adelsman, special assistant to the director at the state Department of Ecology.

The state estimates total 2013 emissions at about 96 million metric tons, Adelsman said. That’s compared with about 88 million metric tons in 1990.

While not weighing in on Inslee’s policies, Amy Snover, assistant dean at the University of Washington’s College of the Environment and director of the Climate Impacts Group, said there is broad agreement that the world is on pace to cross the 2-degree warming threshold.

“Without significant change we will exceed that target and we will see significant impacts at home and around the world. That part is perfectly clear,” Snover said.

Jim Brunner: 206-515-5628 or jbrunner@seattletimes.com. On Twitter @Jim_Brunner

=========================================

State workers hold ‘unity breaks’ to protest wages

By Keith Eldridge Published: May 20, 2015

OLYMPIA, Wash. — Thousands of state workers marched off the job Wednesday in what they called “unity breaks.”

The breaks, which were organized to highlight a pay dispute with the state legislature, were short and done on the worker’s own time.

At the Labor and Industries headquarters in Tumwater a crowd of a hundred workers chanted, “respect, respect, respect.” To these state workers respect comes in the form of a pay raise — one they haven’t seen in years.

“Seven years without even a cost of living raise?” said state employee Dan Miller. “Come on people. Give us a break.”

A “break” is what they’re taking. Unlike the state’s teachers, who’ve walked out and shut down schools for a day, the 20,000 state employees participating in this action just took a 15-minute timeout from work.

“We don’t take public service time away from our jobs. This is our time,” said state employee Mary Miller.

The state House majority democrats have already agreed to the 4.8 percent cost of living increase over the next two years. It was negotiated between the state worker union (AFSCME) and the governor.

But majority republicans in the Senate say no. Their budget offers $1,000 cash increases each of the next two years.

“Right now we feel we’ve put a good offer for public employees on the table because our offer actually gives a bigger pay increase to workers at the lower end of the salary scale,” said Sen. Mark Schoesler, R-majority leader.

But state employee like Imelda Ang say they need more than that.

“It’s not that it isn’t enough,” she said. “This is being re-negotiated again and that is illegal and it’s unfair.”

State workers at 90 different locations across the state staged these first of a kind “unity breaks,” such as at North Seattle College. Hoping they’re heard all the way in Olympia.

“I hope that our legislators down at the state, take a look at what we’re doing today and say ‘yes, they do deserve a cost of living adjustment’ after seven years of going without and one year of taking a three percent cut,” said North Seattle College worker Amy Lezette.

What really angers state workers is that the independent salary review commission just gave state lawmakers an 11 percent pay raise and the governor a 4 percent raise. The governor said he is donating his to individual teachers. State lawmakers can also donate their raises. But, by law they can’t refuse them.

 

Advertisements
Categories: America, Democrats, Governor, Greed, Jobs, Local Governments, Money, Obama, People, Pollution & Global Warming, Rich, Taxes, Unemployed, Washington State, White House | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Post navigation

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: